Where Does the Fed See Systemic Risk?

Where Does the Fed See Systemic Risk?

Short answer? Mutual funds and ETFs!

Longer answer, from the full text of today’s FOMC Minutes, which summarize the discussions held between January 27th and 28th. There’s some stuff in here about the potential for bubbles in commercial real estate while the volatility in FX and oil don’t bother them much at all.

The staff provided its latest report on potential risks to financial stability. Relatively high levels of capital and liquidity in the banking sector, moderate levels of maturity transformation in the financial sector, and a relatively subdued pace of borrowing by the nonfinancial sector continued to be seen as important factors limiting the vulnerability of the financial system to adverse shocks. However, the staff report noted valuation pressures in some asset markets. Such pressures were most notable in corporate debt markets, despite some easing in recent months. In addition, valuation pressures appear to be building in the CRE sector, as indicated by rising prices and the easing in lending standards on CRE loans. Finally, the increased role of bond and loan mutual funds, in conjunction with other factors, may have increased the risk that liquidity pressures could emerge in related markets if investor appetite for such assets wanes. The effects on the largest banking firms of the sharp decline in oil prices and developments in foreign exchange markets appeared limited, although other institutions with more concentrated exposures could face strains if oil prices remain at current levels for a prolonged period.

So basically, because Wall Street’s credit trading and market making operations have been neutered by Dodd-frank regulations, there’s some concern that there will be no one there in the marketplace to cushion the blow if bonds go Bid Wanted. If people start blowing out of fixed income ETFs en masse because rates are rising, there may be more volatility than the bond market is currently accustomed to. It’s a legitimate concern. The dress rehearsal for this happened 20 months ago in May 2013 and it wasn’t pretty.

Shoutout to Matt Boesler for picking up on this comment first.

If you’re interested, the full text can be found below.

Source:

The Fed is prepared to keep rates at zero for longer (Business Insider)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Need to Know: Fed gives the bulls a signal to keep running | BridgeWard News commented on Feb 19

    […] “So, basically, because Wall Street’s credit-trading and market-making operations have been neutered by Dodd-Frank regulations, there’s some concern that there will be no one there in the marketplace to cushion the blow if bonds go Bid Wanted,” writes Josh Brown in his Reformed Broker blog. […]