Meanwhile, at the “Best House in a Bad Neighborhood”…

USA Number One! is the rallying cry of today’s market pundit – it’s both a reflection of the last three years’ worth of outperformance by US stocks as well as the consensus outlook going forward. It’s predicated on the idea that the US economy is doing better than the rest of the world, therefore, US stocks will also continue to trounce foreign stocks.

Unfortunately, that’s too easy.

For starters, everyone is already aware of the better condition of US economic and corporate fundamentals and, as such, we’re likely closer to full participation for US stocks than for most others.

Second, the data is unambiguous – buying cheaper markets is more important for future performance than buying better economies. Dimson, Marsh and Staunton (London Business School) have conclusively shown that it is not current economic conditions that drive future returns – it is shocks to consensus expectations for those economic conditions. Meaning gains or losses for a country’s stocks are explained by how wrong investors are and how quickly they realize it by either buying or selling. They’ve reconstructed a century’s worth of market data from around the world to arrive at this conclusion – you may want to pay attention.

Strong future growth doesn’t help if everyone foresees it and prices it in. There’s no one who didn’t foresee strong future growth at the turn of the last century, which is why the Nasdaq, for example, sucked forward 15 years’ worth of returns into the 36 months ending March 2000. Everyone knew the internet was going to be huge. We were right, but there wasn’t any upside left in betting on it by the end.

Meb Faber has repeatedly demonstrated the value of owning cheaper markets that are laden with poor expectations and stigma attached. He’s even launched a fund based on this premise. Meb shared a Leuthold Group table the other day depicting shows how overly positive sentiment has typically led to bad performance for a given stock market.

But does sentiment help with stock market returns?  Below are the 10 highest and lowest sentiment years and the returns of the stock market the following year.  Not surprisingly high sentiment results in low returns of 0.1% per year.  Low sentiment results in whopping 17.4% returns per year.  What was average sentiment in 2014?   2014 was the second highest value ever at 76.3%.


That sentiment data comes from the Investors Intelligence poll – each year’s reading represents an averaging of every month during that year. I think, based on the data for 2014, it’s safe to say that everyone already agrees the US economy and stock market will do great in 2015. Fortunately for wiser investors, sentiment isn’t very positive at all for major investable markets around the world.

Over at GMO this past week, Ben Inker explains that it’s not the fastest growing or best performing markets that go on to win for investors. It’s the cheapest markets, looking out more than one year.

History tells us that if you are going to be a knee-jerk anything, at least be a knee-jerk contrarian. The 20% of developed stock markets that outperformed most over a three-year period underperformed on average by 1.3% in the following year and by 2.4% annualized over the next three years. The worst 20% of prior performers outperform by 1.6% and 0.8% annualized. The pattern is similar, if weaker, with regard to GDP growth. The fastest GDP growers over the prior three years underperform over the next one and three years by 1.2% and 0.4%, while the worst growers outperform by 0.9% over the next year and marginally underperform by 0.1% over the next three. The performance is summarized in Exhibit 1.

Screen Shot 2015-02-13 at 7.22.01 PM

Josh here – The outlook for the United States is superior to the outlook for virtually everywhere else. No shit. We are all aware of this. This is why Bob Shiller’s CAPE ratio alarm is going bananas right now. But this superiority is what’s already expected and therefore currently being discounted into today’s prices.

What isn’t being discounted? That’s the more interesting (profitable) question.


Ditch the Good, Buy the Bad and the Ugly (GMO)

The Most (Not) Hated Bull Market (Meb Faber)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Bitcoin Evolution Review commented on Sep 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here on that Topic: […]

  2. commented on Sep 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 48977 additional Info on that Topic: […]

  3. Digital Marketing commented on Oct 10

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]

  4. half price hotel after midnight commented on Nov 03

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: […]

  5. 링크맨 commented on Nov 09

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: […]

  6. buy replica money commented on Nov 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 98609 more Info on that Topic: […]