Follow-Up: Securities-Based Lending on Watch

Last month I did a story for Fortune about the explosion in securities-based lending and portfolio loans at the big four brokerage-banks. The feedback behind the scenes ranged from “Finally, this issue getting some attention” to “Josh, you’re making a big deal out of nothing.” One thing’s for certain, the massive volume of feedback tells me that this is a big topic on a lot of people’s minds in the industry.

The Wall Street Journal has an article this morning about how Finra has made securities-based lending at the brokerage firms one its top areas to keep an eye on in 2015.

Securities-backed lending hasn’t been much of a disciplinary issue, but Finra is concerned about the increase in loan volumes as consumer loans are harder to get following the financial crisis and as investors look at other assets to leverage, Mr. Ketchum said.

“What asset has grown considerably for the last six years? That would be equity securities,” he said. “But equity securities and portfolios can fluctuate a great deal, and with that can come the risk.”

At the same time, many brokerages have increased incentives for its advisers to offer securities-based loans to clients. Bank of America Corp. ’s Merrill Lynch, one of the largest securities lenders according to data from SNL Financial, told its 14,000 advisers it would at least double the base payouts for new assets this year, including loans. Others, like UBS AG ’s Wealth Management Americas and Wells Fargo & Co.’s Wells Fargo Advisors, employ similar tactics around advisers’ compensation.

The efforts have paid off. The industry’s largest brokerage firms reported bigger client-loan asset totals for the third quarter, which includes debt products like securities-based loans and margin accounts.

Morgan Stanley , for example, reported $48 billion in client liabilities, up 33% from same period a year earlier. UBS said its U.S. unit saw a 4% year-over-year increase in securities-backed lending.

The premise of my Fortune post wasn’t that anyone was doing anything wrong – just that the rise of borrowing against brokerage assets is probably not a great idea for clients, even though it’s wonderful for their brokers. I understand that lending isn’t new – but the big incentive push is and to me it seems like a conflict. If you dangle the carrot of higher payouts for brokers who encourage their customers to take on more debt, guess who’s going to end up with more debt?

Source:

Finra to Examine Securities-Backed Lending Practices (Wall Street Journal)

 

Read the original story here:

The rise of rich man’s subprime (Fortune)

 

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. DevOps commented on Dec 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 74979 additional Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/01/07/follow-up-securities-based-lending-on-watch/ […]

  2. Regression testing commented on Dec 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 91740 more Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/01/07/follow-up-securities-based-lending-on-watch/ […]