Behold the Awesome Power of Financial Twitter

As Chairman of the Twitter Federal Reserve, I sometimes find myself shaking my head at some of the daily banality I see tweeted and shared amidst my domain. More Twitter users has not been an unqualified positive for the financial web, despite the idea of the “network effect” we’re constantly seeing celebrated elsewhere. Sometimes less participation from a concentrated few produces a better result than more participation from, well, anyone who shows up with an opinion and an agenda.

It’s gotten louder and looser in the last few years, almost entirely to our detriment. A long-time market tweeter joked the other day that the Yahoo Finance message board cretins had finally discovered Twitter and now “there goes the neighborhood.”

But every once in awhile, Financial Twitter manages to surprise me to the upside. Every now and again, I am reminded about why I should be proud to be a part of the conversation.

Because the conversation can still totally rock.

A recent case in point – just one small example of many – would be the dueling GDP charts that ricocheted around all weekend.

On Saturday, at around 5:30 in the morning, the Twitter account of J. Lyons Fund Management put out a tweet with an amazing table of data they’d created. J. Lyons had taken the 25 worst GDP prints in history – in light of this week’s downside shock for Q1’s final revision – and then looked for an example in which these terrible twenty-five hadn’t led to a recession afterward. It turns out there wasn’t a single example in which the US economy had a nasty quarterly GDP print and then escaped the dreaded “R” word during the entire history of the Post-WWII period. Provocatively, we’re told to spot the outlier in the data – which ostensibly would be “this time” if in fact we manage to avoid a contraction in 2014.

The tweet and table embedded below:


A few hours later, I came along and re-shared the tweet, along with some a comment of my own. This got the table in front of thousands of more users, everyone from the Wall Street Journal’s Paul Vigna and Bloomberg’s Trish Regan then weighed in – which pushed it out to even more people.

Now of course, if you’re reading this blog regularly then you already know my attitude toward single variable analysis. You are also aware of how I feel about the idea that anything can be predicted based on the limited sample size of fifty years. But still, the table was compelling and led to some great responses and discussion.

Fast forward to around 5pm on Sunday and we get the below response to the J Lyons GDP table from a tweeter I had never before heard of (I’ve since followed the account):

So it turns out that there has been a recession immediately following each of the 25 worst quarterly GDP prints since the 1940’s – a range in which our Q1 final GDP print of negative 2.9% most assuredly fits.

But within a day and a half, a response is created and shared showing that, despite this seemingly dire data set, an even more important statistic is worth considering – the fact that the S&P 500 trades higher 79% of the time one year after these horrendously recessionary GDP prints. Even juicier is the fact that the average stock market gain in these years turns out to have been roughly 16% – far above the average return of all years, even those in which economic data is robust.

This is a revelation that the casual investor would never spend the time to put together on his own. Even most professionals – myself included – were probably not aware of this particular point.

So much can be learned about the difference between markets and economics from this back-and-forth. It’s an exchange that  demonstrates the usefulness of a crowded and vibrant financial Twittersphere. It is just this sort of sussing out of truth and significance that makes it all worthwhile. I don’t know of any other medium in which we can see something like this take place and participate in it along the way.

Thanks to J. Lyons and Marginal Idea for keeping the light on this weekend. You guys are part of what’s keeping the whole mess from collapsing in on itself. Keep it up.


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. mơ có người chết đánh con gì commented on Sep 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here to that Topic: […]

  2. kid commented on Sep 25

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: […]

  3. Visit us here commented on Oct 05

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here on that Topic: […]

  4. discount male wig with discount commented on Dec 08

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 49732 more Info on that Topic: […]

  5. xem tại đây commented on Dec 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 79546 more Information to that Topic: […]

  6. Red Bull Energy Drink 250ml Wholesale commented on Dec 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: […]

  7. most realistic looking wigs commented on Dec 30

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: […]

  8. Digital Transformation commented on Jan 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 51432 more Info on that Topic: […]

  9. bandar 77 commented on Jan 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: […]

  10. bulk ammo for sale commented on Jan 27

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here on that Topic: […]