“It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is most adaptable to change. In the struggle for survival, the fittest win out at the expense of their rivals because they succeed in adapting themselves best to their environment.”

A lot of people think the above quote comes from Charles Darwin, it’s been sourced as coming out of his Origin of Species but it’s not actually in there. No, this quote was a summation of Darwin’s work from a management professor at LSU in the early 1960’s and then at some point it started being attributed to Darwin himself.

But, for investors, the point remains. Change – or rather the willingness to change – is how you survive in investing. It’s how you get better and how you don’t make “The Big Mistake.”

It’s not an accident that the greatest pure money manager of all time, Peter Lynch, was nicknamed The Chameleon.

He earned the Chameleon moniker because he perceived the changing environments he found himself in and adapted his style accordingly. He was less concerned with being right in academic debates or fighting over “what should happen” and more concerned with making money. FYI, Lynch compounded at an average annual return of 29% and beat the S&P in 11 out of 13 years. He took the Fidelity Magellan Fund from $20 million in 1977 to more than $14 billion when he retired in 1990 – a 2700% gain from start to finish. He didn’t even get the benefit of the next decade’s go-go bull market to pad that record even further.

Lynch remains untouched by anyone – whether they managed money before his career, during it or in the 25 years since. No one even comes close.

What made him special? He made changes in a diverse variety of market environments without obsessing over one metric or another like a dying man clutching a religious totem to his chest.

Lynch had six basic “stories” or types of stocks he liked to play and he leaned toward whichever ones were offering the best opportunities at a given time. He didn’t walk around wearing a sign on his chest that said “Value Investor” or “Momentum Trader” or ” Growth At a Reasonable Price Guy” or “Turnaround Player” and he certainly didn’t care to be put into someone else’s style box. Lynch knew that no approach worked best all the time.

How many guys admit that out loud today in 2014? How many managers have the guts to tell a reporter or an anchorman “To be honest, our area of expertise is not working in this environment, we’re biding our time.” You shall hear that approximately never.

Not many people can do that. It’s hard. But I find it essential. I’ve already tried this the other way – the “stick to your guns” approach – and you can’t imagine the war stories I’ve accumulated. The good news is that I don’t have much of an ego left anymore…

This is why it’s so hard for blowhards to make money – they invest so much emotionally and propound their predictions with such force that they can’t change their minds. They get entrenched because pride doesn’t let them admit a mistake and there is too much public scrutiny. They become attached to the hip with a trade or a thesis, there is no escape other than to stick it out.

Show me a PhD in love with his own theories and I’ll show you someone who’s about to blow up when the environment changes. Show me someone so confident in their system that they actually blame the market when it goes against them and I’ll show you a madman with no understanding of complex adaptive systems. Show me someone who’s already pounded their fist on the table for a certain outcome too many times to go back on it and I’ll show you a tragic Homeric hero going down with his ship.

Most of us are lucky – our careers don’t depend on us having one opinion and maintaining it forever, regardless of new or disproven evidence, in the public eye. Most of us are allowed to say “here’s what I think, but I could be wrong.” Most of us get to admit small defeats and lapses in judgement. Most of us get to make small adjustments as things change without the stigma of highly public, failed predictions.

We should be thankful to be free.

And pity those who aren’t so flexible, those who’ve dug themselves in.

That’s gotta suck…


This post was originally published on May 21st, 2013.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. eatverts commented on Sep 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 8423 additional Info to that Topic: […]

  2. fake rolex commented on Dec 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 96446 more Information on that Topic: […]

  3. bandar77 commented on Jan 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 40321 more Info to that Topic: […]