Three Reasons Active Mutual Funds Suck These Days

Brendan Conway picks up on three basic truths about the State of Active Management from a paper by Smead Capital director of research Tony Scherrer. There are three reasons why the modern actively managed mutual funds suck, according to the research:

1. Benchmark-hugging has now grown into such a large phenomenon that, when combined with traditional index funds, it accounts for 50% of the total fund industry’s assets. Funds that demonstrate so-called active share and genuinely buck the benchmarks are growing increasingly rare with every passing year.

2. Modern fund managers are trading way to often. Portfolio turnover seems to be rising each year and is now approaching an average of 100%. They’re watching too much Fast Money? They think that somehow doing something is better than doing nothing because it demonstrates how hard they’re working?

3. Trading costs are too high, too. What comes along with lots of trading is lots of trading costs. Scherrer puts the annual cost at around 1.4% (average) to 2.59% for small cap managers, which really takes a chunk out returns.

Read more on the subject and see some great charts at Barron’s below…


Active Managers Stink? Blame These All-Too-Common Fund Flaws (Focus On Funds)


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. 안전공원 commented on Oct 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 71290 more Info on that Topic: […]