Intel: Anatomy of a Tech Value Trap

Is Intel “cheap”?

Sure, at ten times earnings, why not?

Only it’s more like 12 times forward earnings given the drop in gross margins and operating income The Street is now expecting on the heels of last night’s call.

Revenue growth is stangnant-to-collapsing too, depending on the season. There is a piddling amount of growth happening in one small area of the business, but where it counts there is only deterioration in both demand and pricing. After posting a year-over-year drop in revenue of 2.5% (and a 6.7% sequential drop from Q4), Intel is now forecasting single-digits sales growth for full-year 2013 but I’d take the under on that.

And despite this, the stock is inexplicably selling for almost 2 times sales – I can’t imagine why this should be the case, I can only come up with “for old time’s sake” as it’s a Dow component and a former darling. There is no growth here to justify a market multiple.

Competitively speaking, you’d have to say that Intel is dominant in a dying market (like being the ship’s captain on the Titanic). And it is merely an also-ran in the future of computing – mobile – where it must contend with entrenched giants Qualcomm and ARM Holdings. It is in Intel’s DNA to be the incumbent and ward off smaller foes like AMD, it is not accustomed to fighting uphill. Recent announcements about making in-roads into software and “wireless TV” sound like the flailing of a desperate company in pursuit of new growth opportunities, I’m not sure why anyone should expect them to automatically find success in these “foreign” markets.

The current CEO just reported his last quarter and is now heading in retirement. It was a weak quarter but he did not lower guidance on the call. How much would you like to bet that the company spared him the ignominious exit and that a warning is coming sometime between now and the next quarter? We already know that the PC market contracted by 14% in just the first quarter of this year, and Intel’s PC revenues are four times the size of its decent data services business.

Intel has played the expectations game extraordinarily well over the last few years – they’ve beaten the consensus estimates by an average of 10% going back to the July 2011 quarter. Unfortunately, this has not translated to any kind of benefit for longs – the stock has been down an average of 4.2% in the week following these reports. In other words, nobody’s been fooled.

The armchair value investor looks at the stock and says it’s “cheap” and pays a nice dividend.I can cite a million examples of formerly cutting edge technology and industrial companies that shrank for years even as they always looked undervalued and paid a decent yield.

Intel has bought back a tenth of the float over the last few years and now pays a 4% dividend yield. Unfortunately, this does not signal underlying strength at the business. The company now sports a $11o billion market cap, has $17 billion in cash and about $13 billion in debt. This is a net cash position of under $4 billion, nothing special. The question is whether or not this type of ongoing return of cash to shareholders is wise given the fact that Intel is in a strategic transition and attempting to tackle brand new lines of business with heavy capex spending requirements.

Besides, it’s not as though the buybacks or dividends are bringing investors in or helping the stock price – Intel is down some 20% over the last year in the midst of an “everybody wins” broad market rally.

The bottom line is that Intel is a very well-managed, gigantic company and has gotten by lately with tight inventory controls and conservative guidance. This is why the reckoning has taken place in slow-motion and value investors have been crushed gently rather than in sharp, jagged falls.

But I do not think the positive sentiment surrounding this company and its vaunted legacy in the high-tech pantheon has been sufficiently washed away yet. There is still way too much belief that Intel can seamlessly compete in mobile and cloud. There are still hopeful longs who believe the turnaround begins any day now. This can be seen in the valuation, in my opinion, and in the media’s hesitance to talk about the company the way they now do Microsoft and Hewlett-Packard. Until there are signs that Intel has either truly turned things around or has become more detested, I see very little opportunity for an investment here.

This is precisely what a Value Trap looks like.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. immediate edge reviews commented on Sep 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/04/17/intel-anatomy-of-a-tech-value-trap/ […]

  2. kid commented on Sep 25

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/04/17/intel-anatomy-of-a-tech-value-trap/ […]

  3. 토렌트큐큐 commented on Nov 09

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 91212 more Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/04/17/intel-anatomy-of-a-tech-value-trap/ […]

  4. book hotel commented on Nov 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/04/17/intel-anatomy-of-a-tech-value-trap/ […]

  5. wig stores near me commented on Nov 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/04/17/intel-anatomy-of-a-tech-value-trap/ […]

  6. 토토 commented on Dec 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/04/17/intel-anatomy-of-a-tech-value-trap/ […]

  7. buy arimidex commented on Jan 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/04/17/intel-anatomy-of-a-tech-value-trap/ […]

  8. bandar 77 commented on Jan 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/04/17/intel-anatomy-of-a-tech-value-trap/ […]