Fund Flows and the Positive Feedback Loop

One of the things people should understand about the effect that historical returns have on large-scale rotations, especially in the institutional sphere of investment management, is that the 3-year number trumps all.

It is the major performance measure that goes into the decision-making process (alongside risk-reward, valuation etc) when shifts of allocation are being considered.

Positive 3-year numbers for a given asset class make a plan look better, and so they get included more frequently and in higher weightings for proposals than do asset classes whose back-tested 3-year numbers act as a drag.

Now you might say “But that’s backwards! Wouldn’t you want to include more of what hasn’t worked for a forward-looking plan rather than more of what has already worked?”  By asking that question, you betray a lack of understanding in how the human mind works. On Wall Street, plans and proposed allocations are rarely about what will work – they are about closing sales by alluding to what has been working and should continue to.

And so as allocation plans are drawn up, on a go-forward basis, the new math looks like this:

BarCap Global Aggregate Bond Index 3-year performance: 4.97%

S&P 500 Total Return 3-year performance: 15.3%

The question is, do you really think professional managers are going to underweight stocks anymore now that the 3-year numbers look like this? This is how the positive feedback loop begins. We can talk about how it ends another time.

The psychological shift away from the 2008 mindset happens slowly at first – and then all at once.

If you’d like to see this writ large, here’s a piece of BAML research John Melloy sent out earlier on this past week’s fund flows:

Stat #1: SECOND-BIGGEST EQUITY INFLOW EVER — $22.2bn inflows ($13bn via ETF’s and $9bn via LO funds) wk ending Jan 9


Source: BofAML (compilation of Lipper/EPFR data)

The driver here is allocation. The shifts happening right now within the $60 trillion pool of investable assets are tectonic.



This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Vape Juice commented on Sep 25

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 97568 more Information to that Topic: […]

  2. td easyweb online commented on Dec 05

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 69187 more Information on that Topic: […]

  3. Skrot bil commented on Jan 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]

  4. dumps + pin site commented on Jan 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here to that Topic: […]