Respect the Technicals: How to Avoid the Next Hewlett-Packard

“We don’t take our signals from the market,” a well-known value investor recently remarked, a few months before blowing up his fund.

I have no respect for any market participant who cannot accept that there is value to be had from considering aspects of other disciplines when making investments and trades. I spent the first seven years of my career blowing myself up in so-called “cheap” stocks with “good” fundamentals and “smart” management teams. Often, I had a great company but no risk management and a poorly timed buy or sell. it wasn’t until I began incorporating technical analysis that I started to really feel like I was making progress as an investor.

They say “Fundamentals tell you what to buy, Technicals tell you when to buy it.”  I like that, even if it may be oversimplified.  In the case of Hewlett-Packard, the fundamentals and valuation have trapped millions of investors. If only they’d respected the money-flow and supply/demand picture of the stock, they’d have saved themselves billions of dollars and a ton of embarrassment.

At Fusion, we quantitatively rank every stock and ETF by multiple factors, some of which are fundamental and some are technical. It’s a good starting point, not a fool-proof method, but at least it’s something. So many analysts and investors make one or two-factor decisions and ignore variables that they weren’t taught in college. And that’s how they end up getting suckered by a value trap like Hewlett-Packard, while missing the obvious negatives away from “valuation.”

But those who pay attention to both fundamentals and technicals probably missed the horror show of HPQ, despite its status as a “good” company and a “blue chip” stock. In the below screenshot, the downtrend in HPQ is so obvious that a child could be taught to spot it with a 30 minute classroom lesson. Funamental analysts would be doing themselves a huge favor by incorporating some of this stuff while they still have a solvent firm client left.

(Click to Embiggen!)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. bitcoin era review commented on Sep 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2012/10/04/repsect-the-technicals-how-to-avoid-the-next-hewlett-packard/ […]

  2. bitcoin evolution review commented on Sep 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2012/10/04/repsect-the-technicals-how-to-avoid-the-next-hewlett-packard/ […]

  3. immediate edge commented on Sep 25

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 92095 additional Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2012/10/04/repsect-the-technicals-how-to-avoid-the-next-hewlett-packard/ […]

  4. bitcoin registrarse chile commented on Sep 30

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 98792 more Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2012/10/04/repsect-the-technicals-how-to-avoid-the-next-hewlett-packard/ […]

  5. maha pharma labs commented on Oct 08

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 99499 additional Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2012/10/04/repsect-the-technicals-how-to-avoid-the-next-hewlett-packard/ […]

  6. replica rolex commented on Dec 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2012/10/04/repsect-the-technicals-how-to-avoid-the-next-hewlett-packard/ […]

  7. Regression Testing Services commented on Jan 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2012/10/04/repsect-the-technicals-how-to-avoid-the-next-hewlett-packard/ […]