John Hussman on Moving Average Crossover Strategies

A lot of guys who run money tactically make some use of the 50-day and 200-day moving average crossovers as their signals to buy or sell whole chunks of equity exposure for the clients.  Which is good, not great. We pay attention to some of that but we certainly aren’t living and dying by it absent other inputs.

There are no fool-proof timing signals that “always work” – at least that I’m aware of – but even having any discipline and systematic risk management approach is often better than none at all.  Some of the simpler moving average crossovers have been shown to have saved people a lot of aggravation in 2008 (they had you out of the way when applied to the major indices, for example) but they don’t always get you back in when you should be. They also are plagued by false signals and headfakes – just like any other system.

John Hussman took a look at these crossover risk-on, risk-off signals and the concept of trend following the other day…

The charts below feature a variety of moving-average crossover strategies using the S&P 500. The darker blue line tracks the total return of the S&P 500, and the others track a variety of strategies that are long when the S&P 500 index is above the given moving average, and in T-bills otherwise (the moving averages are exponential – giving a weight of 2/(N+1) to the most recent observation, and the rest to the prior value of the MA, where N is the length of the MA). The moving average lengths are Fibonacci numbers, which is a common practice among technicians.

At first glance, these strategies seem very promising, particularly for the 21-week moving average crossover, which produces a cumulative return about 40 percentage points more than a buy-and-hold since 1950. Unfortunately, over 62 years, that difference is actually quite small, amounting to just 0.5% annually. And even that excludes all transactions costs, taxes, and slippage. If you look carefully, you’ll also notice that drawdowns are not particularly small. In fact, the 21-week crossover strategy has a maximum drawdown during this period of nearly 40%. The reason is that the strategy has had an awful tendency to buy into rallies just at the point where they fail abruptly, and to sell into declines just at the point where they rally sharply. You can see this reflected in the drawdown of the 21-week crossover strategy (purple) during the 2000-2002 decline. The trend is your fickle friend.

Head over for the whole discussion, it’s great stuff.


The Trend is Your Fickle Friend (Hussman Funds)


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. eatverts commented on Sep 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: […]

  2. Bitcoin Era Review commented on Sep 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: […]

  3. 918kiss commented on Sep 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 649 additional Information on that Topic: […]

  4. stripe connect commented on Dec 07

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: […]

  5. Functional testing commented on Dec 08

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: […]

  6. Hire Online web Designer in Canada commented on Dec 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on on that Topic: […]

  7. 메이저놀이터 commented on Dec 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 32934 more Info to that Topic: […]

  8. estate lawyer commented on Jan 08

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 65392 more Information on that Topic: […]

  9. repliki zegarkow commented on Jan 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here on that Topic: […]

  10. Buy Steroids Online commented on Jan 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: […]

  11. commented on Jan 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here to that Topic: […]