I love my friend Joe Weisenthal and I know he’s half-kidding with his monthly routine of turning the BLS Non Farm Payrolls report into the Super Bowl – twelve times a year. We’ve gotten into this habit in the financial web and media of treating each successive BLS Day since the crash as though it’s the most important one EVER!

But the truth is, only a few of them, at specific junctures for the market and economy, were all that important.  And even then, its always the trend that’s mattered more, never the single monthly number.

This particular one is totally meaningless other than for the three-digit Dow rally or sell-off it might produce in the ultra-short term.

For starters, it’s meaningless for the usual reasons – 99% of people have no idea what the hell they’re even looking at and the pundits are particularly absurd (even more so than usual) in the wake of these reports.  I’mma let my man Jeff Miller ride on these fools:

There is a list of repeated monthly mistakes by the assembled jobs punditry:

  • Focus on net job creation.  This is the most important.  The big story is the teeming stew of job gains and losses.  It is never mentioned on employment Friday.  The US economy creates over 7 million jobs every quarter.
  • Failure to recognize sampling error.  The payroll number has a confidence interval of +/- 105K jobs.  The household survey is +/- 450K jobs.  We take small deviations from expectations too seriously — far too seriously.
  • False emphasis on “the internals.”  Pundits pontificate on various sub-categories of the report, assuming laser-like accuracy.  In fact, the sampling error (not to mention revisions and non-sampling error) in these categories is huge.
  • Negative spin on the BLS methods.  There is a routine monthly question about how many payroll jobs were added by the BLS birth/death adjustment.  This is a propaganda war that seems to have ended years ago with a huge bearish spin.  For anyone who really wants to know, the BLS methods have been under-estimating new job creation.  This was demonstrated in the latest benchmark revisions, which added more jobs, as well as the most recent report from state employment offices.

And then there are the factors unique to this particular report that render it meaningless:

1.  US stocks are not trading based on US data anymore.  Our testicles and ovaries are currently lying on a butcher’s block waiting for the Greek election to send the entire weight of the global monetary system crushing down upon them with great force and biblical violence.

2.  The Spanish bank run currently underway, with tens of billions fleeing the country’s financial institutions is also going to play a more critical role this summer than anything taking place here in the US on a farm or off a farm.

3.  China is almost certainly heading toward technical recession.  There’s actually not a single mainstream measure of economic activity or credit that says otherwise.  Not even one.  Have a look at the latest shitshow, official PMI came out minutes ago way below expectations.  The ministers there are talking about stimulus while simultaneously looking to hold down prices and clean up the over-building mess.  Stimulus and economic constraint do not happen simultaneously ever anywhere on planet earth, you do one or you do the other.

4.  The election and the fiscal cliff stuff is in the back of everyone’s minds.  We all know that no matter who wins the election, taxes are going up in some way, shape or form.  And we all know that government spending is going to drop in some way, shape or form.  These two developments are inexorable and neither one of them are conducive to GDP growth or labor market amelioration at the outset.  I’m sorry.

And so with these four items at the fore, please explain to me how anything in tomorrow’s report changes a single thing.  How?

The truth is that unless we’ve somehow magically added 500,000 jobs this month and we see massive upward revisions for March and April, the number itself simply won’t matter at all past the first hour or two.  Our economy is doing okay, not terribly and not great.  And right now, it just doesn’t matter, I don’t care if Angelina Jolie releases the data, topless and smothered in mayonnaise.

So sleep tight and be up bright and early tomorrow – for the Least Important Jobs Report of All Time!




This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Reliant Energy Rates commented on Sep 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: […]

  2. commented on Sep 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 8108 additional Information to that Topic: […]

  3. que es bitcoin evolution commented on Sep 30

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: […]

  4. 토토 commented on Oct 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: […]

  5. td online banking canada commented on Oct 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here on that Topic: […]

  6. houses for sale in Golden Eagle commented on Oct 20

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: […]

  7. online banking rbc commented on Nov 09

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]

  8. Harold Jahn Canada commented on Nov 13

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: […]

  9. replica rolex cellini commented on Dec 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 33868 more Information to that Topic: […]

  10. Skrota bilen Trollhättan commented on Jan 10

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 9188 more Information to that Topic: […]

  11. DevSecOps commented on Jan 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here to that Topic: […]

  12. Klik hier! commented on Feb 02

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]