Gold and the Too Many Schmucks Problem

I was out at dinner last night with a few friends and once the wives the went off into their own lala-land conversation about god knows what, the boys began talking about the usual rundown of topics:

1.  How hot is that waitress over there?  How old do you think she is? etc.

2.  NFL and Fantasy football etc. (yes, one of my favorite things is listening to guys describe their fantasy football teams in detail and where they stand in their leagues and all that – I just love it and can never get enough)

3.  Gold

And the thing about the gold thing is that now everyone’s suddenly bragging about the fact that “Oh, yeah, I got out already.”  Of course they did.  And by the way, no one at the table works on Wall Street.  My friends are doctors or pharmaceutical sales reps or they’re in real estate or the jewelry business – I go out of my way to spend as little time as possible outside of work with other Wall Street assholes like myself.  And this isn’t easy to do where I live.

The only guy at the table who admits to still be long gold is the guy that goes “Yeah, I don’t really care where it trades in any given year, I only own it as a hedge for my currency risk long-term.”  Okay.

I have some gold in my client portfolios.  It’s an asset class and we have some exposure, mainly through an active manager we work with who’s been a gold bull since $300 an ounce, long before owning gold would’ve occurred to almost anyone else.  We’ll leave his weighting in gold to his discretion.

I don’t profess to have any particular expertise in precious metals but I know deflation when I see it.  But more importantly, I also know a crowded trade.  Gold had become the quintessential crowded trade and at the height of the Euro crisis this summer it had gotten flat out silly.  The way people off The Street were talking about it sounded an awful lot like the one-way run in real estate a few years back.  For me, a correction was obviously going to occur but it became a question of when and from what price.  I’ve mentioned 2000 an ounce here and there as where I thought the big selling would come in.  Close but no cigar.

And the correction so far has been brutal – not so much in terms of price but in terms of timing (right at year-end!) and in terms of swiftness (what do you mean gold’s down a few hundred bucks this fall?).  Gold dropped through the 200-day moving average like it didn’t even exist this past week and it is now hugging long-term support in the 1500’s.

The believers are fully entrenched and will not acknowledge the dynamics of a crowded trade with too many schmucks in it.  Here’s a take in Barron’s this weekend from a piece by Andrew Bary and Jaquelin Doherty, they steal my trademarked phrase in their story’s title: “Next: “Face-Ripping” Inflation?“…

“A full deleveraging of the banking system could mean that the dollar and other currencies will lose 70% to 80% of their purchasing power,” Quaintance says, arguing that all major banks in developed lands will suffer because markets are so interconnected.

How should investors prepare if they buy into this Grinch-y world view? Buy gold and unlevered assets, says Quaintance. The losers in this scenario: holders of cash and “risk-free” Treasuries. Of course, cash and Treasuries are what risk-adverse investors favor right now.

I know, it’s always right around the corner.

But the bears are becoming as vocal as I can remember them in the yellow metal.  Reuters polled 20 top hedge fund managers and other big shots – they say gold is headed lower in Q1…

Gold prices will fall below $1,500 an ounce over the next three months and are unlikely to retest September’s all-time highs until later 2012 at the earliest, according to a Reuters poll of 20 hedge fund managers, economists and traders.

The bleak forecast, coming after gold has lost 11 percent of its value so far this month, is likely to fuel fears that bullion is close to ending its more than decade long bull run and entering a bear market.

Almost half of respondents predicted bullion will fall to 1,450 an ounce in the first quarter next year, with three seeing prices as low as $1,400 an ounce.

The forecasts come after a dismal performance last week when prices hit a 2 1/2 month low of $1,560 and gold lost its safe haven status.

So who to listen to?  The believers or the now-bitten pragmatists who were happy to be in the trade so long as it was working?  That’s for everyone to decide for themselves at this point.  But one thing’s for sure, gold has become a very tough trade and I expect rallies to find stiff resistance from the Too Many Schmucks factor, they will now be selling what they plowed into at the recent high.  This is a fact.





This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Zeitarbeitsfirma Pflege Wismar commented on Sep 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here to that Topic: […]

  2. commented on Oct 03

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 71150 additional Info on that Topic: […]

  3. fake breitling diver commented on Dec 08

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here to that Topic: […]

  4. fake omega seamaster old model commented on Dec 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here to that Topic: […]

  5. fake rolex commented on Dec 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: […]

  6. tangerine banque log in commented on Jan 13

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here on that Topic: […]