Downgrade Leads to Blogger Brilliance

The big story this weekend was, of course, the S&P downgrade of US debt.  But there’s another story worth talking about – The incredible writing that this development has brought out from some of the finest market commentators who’ve ever done it.

In this post, I want to highlight some of the people who’ve really captured the gist of what this all means and may mean and should mean for the benefit of our readers.  Bravo, you guys!


Dan Alpert asks what right S&P has to question our ability to pay the debt:

The size of the U.S. economy, the wealth of its inhabitants and the assets of the sovereign entity itself, are unquestionably more than adequate to repay, with interest, all of the $14 trillion or so of the nation’s debt (much of which, by the way, is owed to itself)…and then some.  Anyone with a rudimentary understanding of finance and economics can figure that out.


On the S&P Downgrade of the United States of America (Economonitor)

Jeff Carter explains what the move by S&P means for you and I in real life:

1. The cost of government borrowing just went up, that includes states and munis too. This adds to your tax burden.

2. Higher government borrowing costs filter through the economy. It makes it slightly more expensive for corporations to borrow money. This is a drag on GDP.

3. Higher corporate borrowing costs filter down to consumers-the cost of some consumer loans might be slightly higher.

4. Puts a lot of political pressure on elected officials to actually cut the budget. We need to get back to a more traditional GDP/debt ratio. Once that’s done, why wouldn’t S&P take us back up to AAA?


AA+: S&P Downgraded US Credit (Points and Figures)

Barry Ritholtz asks the most unanswered question surrounding all of this debt stuff:

The change in trajectory of US debt was in service of Banks: It began with TARP, and continued with every other bailout/stimulus/economic plan. What was S&P’s role in creating that crisis?


10 Questions About S&P Downgrade (The Big Picture)

Fightin’ Joe Donahue on how to play the market reaction this week:

Friday’s headline will create some issues for sure, but this was no surprise.  If we have a massive sell off on Monday (which I hope is the case), I will leverage my kids and get long for the rally. I will trade that rally and then look for shorts (which shouldn’t be chased here). Why? Because market bottoms rarely end with days like Thursday, and I don’t think we have seen true capitulation in the market yet. A massive flush needs to occur in my opinion for me to make  long bets again for any duration more than a day or two. The trend is broken and charts have been decimated. We are back to “trading the tape” again and if you are a novice or a beginner, it’s probably a good time to take that vacation you have been thinking about.


Come Monday (Upside Trader)

The Fly, ever playing the contrarian:

All in all, in my opinion, it is a NON-EVENT.

The real story is still in Europe. Don’t let this downgrade shit distract you. The ECB needs to start monetizing their debt now, else world markets will continue to slide. Providing a deal is announced by Sunday, I expect a patriotic “fuck you S&P” rally on Monday.

It’s the American way.


The S&P Downgrade is a Non-Event (iBankCoin)

David Merkel cuts through all the opinion and gets straight to the facts:

The thing is, politics matters.  If we have a fiat currency, then it is politically driven.  If our politics with respect to debt repayment are unstable, then we don’t deserve a AAA.

But much as I don’t like the t-party, I do not blame them for this outcome.  I blame Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, Carter, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, Eisenhower and CONGRESS.  They have overspent. They have created many useless programs.  They have created burdensome programs, they have turned medical care into a zoo of red tape. THEY HAVE NOT CARED FOR THE FUTURE OF THE NATION, BUT ONLY THE PRESENT!!

On the S&P Downgrade (Aleph Blog)


I’m guessing there will be much more excellence to come tomorrow, nicely done everyone!


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. sex commented on Sep 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on on that Topic: […]

  2. Bitcoin Era Review commented on Sep 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: […]

  3. Bitcoin Loophole Review commented on Sep 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here to that Topic: […]

  4. bitcoin loophole commented on Oct 03

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: […]

  5. Eric Arnoux commented on Oct 09

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: […]

  6. fun88 commented on Oct 13

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on to that Topic: […]

  7. what is tangerine commented on Nov 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]

  8. regression testing commented on Nov 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: […]

  9. hotel club commented on Dec 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 45657 more Info on that Topic: […]

  10. 토토사이트 commented on Dec 27

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]

  11. wigs commented on Jan 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here on that Topic: […]

  12. wigs for women commented on Jan 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]