How Should Investors React to Geopolitical Shocks?

You wake up one day and someone has attacked someone else in a wasteland on the other side of the world.  The important-sounding man on TV is telling us that everything has changed and that things will never be the same.

But they will be the same.

Because in 18 months that same exact important-sounding man will be on another channel discussing yet another geopolitical event as though things will never be the same.  That’s what he’s brought on to do.  The words vary little from “crisis” to “crisis” but sometimes his tie does.  Sometimes even that remains the same.

Nancy Miller has an article up at The Fiscal Times that examines the question of what investors should do – if anything – to their portfolios when global events turn violent.  I have a few quotes in the piece that are meant to give people perspective:

“If you say because of what’s happening in Libya or Egypt that you will buy oil — you’re not investing. You’re gambling,” says Joshua M. Brown, vice president of Fusion Analytics and author of The Reformed Broker. Brown notes that if you bought the “peace dividend” story after the Berlin Wall fell in 1989, you would have gotten caught in a two-year stock market recession. Similarly, if you pulled your money out of the market after 9/11, you would have missed a rally that lasted more than six years, he says.

My message is that these events come and go, they should not be the basis for someone constructing any kind of long-term plan around even though they are certainly tradeable events for the fleet-footed.

And while many grownups understand that televised “news analysis” is a business, many can’t help but to feel as though they’re supposed to be “doing something” with their portfolio each time some Fourth World hellpit has a flare-up.  As if they haven’t been cutting each others’ heads off in places like Libya and Afghanistan since the beginning of time.  Please.

The reality is that for the most part, stock markets that sell off on geopolitical surprises should be bought rather than sold.

Taking it a step further, when we’re talking about conflicts that eventually involve our military, the buying opportunity has historically been even greater at times – stocks breaking out to the upside on the relief of war’s actual start after months of drum-beating foreplay.   On top of that, the deficits we tend to run during wartime eventually make for nicely inflationary environments, the kind that produce a spate of high-growth years for the economy.  For a reference point on this stuff, go check out My Favorite Chart on Earth.

My message here is that there are tons of things to be concerned with right now, the least of which are protests in the Mideast (which in the long-run are probably excellent developments rather than negative ones).  There was “geopolitical uncertainty” on September 10th 2001 just like there was on September 12th 2001, the difference being that on the 10th no one realized it and on the 12th it seemed as though we’d never return to normalcy again.

Focusing on long-term goals and the rates of return needed to achieve them is much more intelligent than trying to game tomorrow’s volatile headlines.

Read Also:

The Big Market Worry: Investor Overreaction (The Fiscal Times)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Unicc commented on Jan 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: […]