SEC Recommends Uniform Standard of Care

There are so many caveats in this report that it’s almost anti-climactic after six months of expectation and debate.

Basically the SEC has looked at the issue of whether stockbrokers should be able to operate under mere Suitability requirements while only financial advisors have a true Fiduciary standard of care.  They’ve just reported their findings along with a recommendation to Congress.

Based on the study, the commission seems to agree that everyone should abide by a uniform code if they’re going to be dealing with the public; how such a standard should be interpreted and implemented requires more study, however.

From Financial Planning Magazine:

As part of the Dodd-Frank law, the SEC was told it could hold brokers to a higher standard, forcing them to put their client interests above their own. Advisors are already held to that standard.

The much-anticipated study found that many investors are confused about the roles of brokers and advisors and are unsure of their protections when they receive advice. The study recommended the SEC create a uniform standard to simplify the client experience.

“Retail customers should not have to parse through legal distinctions to determine whether the advice they receive was provided in accordance with their expectations,” the study said.

The powerful Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) seemed pleased with the uniform code but many factions on The Street will not be.  Advisor groups will complain that by including brokers and people who sell product for a living, the Fiduciary Standard itself will become watered down and lose it’s meaning.  Brokerages will say that it will be impossible to conduct their model under the code and that this represents the beginning of the end of transactional commission business.

I’ll be covering this subject, as I have been, extensively at my Wall Street Journal FA blog perch.

SEC Recommends Uniform Fiduciary Standard (FP)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Blue Coaster33 commented on Apr 30

    The Silent Shard

    This may probably be fairly useful for a few of the work opportunities I intend to do not only with my blog but

  2. Bitcoin Era Review commented on Sep 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: […]

  3. How to Order THC concentrates online commented on Sep 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here on that Topic: […]

  4. newest sex doll commented on Sep 25

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: […]

  5. bitcoin evolution commented on Oct 01

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: […]

  6. 918kiss commented on Oct 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 37180 additional Info to that Topic: […]

  7. car report commented on Jan 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 74453 more Information on that Topic: […]

  8. cheap wigs commented on Jan 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on on that Topic: […]