Stockflation at the Gates of the 'Stimulus Rapture'

Is the ‘Stimulus Rapture’ about to commence?  More signs appear each day that it is not necessary.

Shock-and-Awe Quantitative Easing or Incremental Quantitative Easing – either way, I’m not feeling the idea of a new massive stimulus all that much these days.  In fact, it scares me.

My “Raise Rates” post from yesterday made the case that we’ve seen enough “emergency response” from the Fed.  Outside of Fed Funds rates being at “permanent midnight”, the impotent yet ongoing fiscal stimulus (government spending) has not been shown to have done much of anything either  – and please don’t tell me about Jobs Saved, this was never the stated intention until the whole Jobs Gained plan failed.

Here are two pieces of fresh evidence that the Federal Reserve/Federal Government tag team can start thinking about standing down:

Bloomberg is chronicling the better-than-expected earnings season this morning noting that 85% of S&P companies have beaten estimates thus far.  More importantly, giant cyclical companies like UPS, CSX Railroad, Intel and Boeing are growing just fine without waiting for QE2.  To be fair, a lot of the growth these companies are recording is from overseas business, but you’ve got to start somewhere.

More disturbingly is the fact that outside of home prices, inflation is becoming more and more of a reality.  Don’t take my word for it, just take a look at this list of the top performing ETFs over the last 90 days (via The Fly):

Top performing ETF’s were:

1. SGG +68% (sugar)

2. AGQ +66% (silver)

3. CZM +65% (China)

4. EDC +54% (emerging mkts)

5.  BDD +52% (metals)

6. JJT +51% (tin)

7. BAL +50% (cotton)

8. UYM +43% (basic materials)

9. CU +42% (copper)

10. JJS +39% (soft commodities)

Must the evidence continue to mount?  Must gasoline prices and grocery bills shoot up to stratospheric heights?  Can’t we acknowledge that US corporations cannot continue to grow, even overseas, without hiring more US employees.  And can we not agree that this is preferable to relying on government creating jobs?

The propping up of the dead and the dying via federal spending and zero percent rates is not warranted with markets and prices rebounding elsewhere.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. dumps shop online commented on Jan 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]

  2. Unicc commented on Jan 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here to that Topic: […]