A Pair of Brutal Anti-Wall Street Op-Eds in the NYT

On the New York Times site this morning, we are treated to not one, but two brutal op-ed pieces on the men who benefited most from the boom-and-bust.

In the first, Frank Rich writes about a literary parallel between the crumbling of Lehman and the release of a best-selling crime novel in which the bad guys are the bankers who wreck their own countries in pursuit of profits for their clients…

“A bank director who blows millions on foolhardy speculations should not keep his job,” writes Larsson in one typical passage. “A managing director who plays shell company games should do time.”…He pleads for some “tough reporter” to “identify and expose as traitors” the financial players who have “systematically and perhaps deliberately” damaged their country’s economy “to satisfy the profit interests of their clients.”

The article goes on to expose the fairy tale that the top bank execs were themselves ruined by the financial crisis, instead reminding us that they paid themselves around a quarter of a billion each for their leadership of the past decade.

And in case you aren’t disgusted enough, there is the other op-ed by Roger Lowenstein to consider from the other day, the one where that age old question is asked and partially answered:  “Who Needs Wall Street?”…

Mike Mayo is a veteran of six Wall Street banks. In the wake of the street’s disaster, he found refuge at a boutique brokerage and has lately taken to startling his peers with the question “What part of Goldman Sachs is good for the country?”  Regular people will be tempted to answer, “None of it,” but the question reminds us that, at least in theory, Wall Street serves society (not the other way around).

Lowenstein breaks down the societal importance of trading, capital raising and the CDS freak show in the piece.

Even after a 75% S&P rally, the PR firms of The Street have their work cut out for them.

Here are links to both op-eds:

Obama, Lehman and ‘The Dragon Tattoo’ By FRANK RICH Published: March 20, 2010 (NYT)

Who Needs Wall Street? By ROGER LOWENSTEIN Published: March 15, 2010 (NYT)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. hotel definition commented on Dec 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/03/21/a-pair-of-brutal-anti-wall-street-op-eds-in-the-nyt/ […]

  2. 메이저놀이터 commented on Dec 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/03/21/a-pair-of-brutal-anti-wall-street-op-eds-in-the-nyt/ […]

  3. Bauknecht GSXK 5104A2 manuals commented on Jan 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/03/21/a-pair-of-brutal-anti-wall-street-op-eds-in-the-nyt/ […]

  4. Fulgor Milano LWD 12 manuals commented on Jan 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/03/21/a-pair-of-brutal-anti-wall-street-op-eds-in-the-nyt/ […]

  5. LG LW1512ER manuals commented on Jan 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/03/21/a-pair-of-brutal-anti-wall-street-op-eds-in-the-nyt/ […]