A Pair of Brutal Anti-Wall Street Op-Eds in the NYT

On the New York Times site this morning, we are treated to not one, but two brutal op-ed pieces on the men who benefited most from the boom-and-bust.

In the first, Frank Rich writes about a literary parallel between the crumbling of Lehman and the release of a best-selling crime novel in which the bad guys are the bankers who wreck their own countries in pursuit of profits for their clients…

“A bank director who blows millions on foolhardy speculations should not keep his job,” writes Larsson in one typical passage. “A managing director who plays shell company games should do time.”…He pleads for some “tough reporter” to “identify and expose as traitors” the financial players who have “systematically and perhaps deliberately” damaged their country’s economy “to satisfy the profit interests of their clients.”

The article goes on to expose the fairy tale that the top bank execs were themselves ruined by the financial crisis, instead reminding us that they paid themselves around a quarter of a billion each for their leadership of the past decade.

And in case you aren’t disgusted enough, there is the other op-ed by Roger Lowenstein to consider from the other day, the one where that age old question is asked and partially answered:  “Who Needs Wall Street?”…

Mike Mayo is a veteran of six Wall Street banks. In the wake of the street’s disaster, he found refuge at a boutique brokerage and has lately taken to startling his peers with the question “What part of Goldman Sachs is good for the country?”  Regular people will be tempted to answer, “None of it,” but the question reminds us that, at least in theory, Wall Street serves society (not the other way around).

Lowenstein breaks down the societal importance of trading, capital raising and the CDS freak show in the piece.

Even after a 75% S&P rally, the PR firms of The Street have their work cut out for them.

Here are links to both op-eds:

Obama, Lehman and ‘The Dragon Tattoo’ By FRANK RICH Published: March 20, 2010 (NYT)

Who Needs Wall Street? By ROGER LOWENSTEIN Published: March 15, 2010 (NYT)

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. how to make transitions on video star commented on Sep 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/03/21/a-pair-of-brutal-anti-wall-street-op-eds-in-the-nyt/ […]

  2. sex commented on Sep 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 28396 more Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/03/21/a-pair-of-brutal-anti-wall-street-op-eds-in-the-nyt/ […]

  3. btc loophole commented on Sep 27

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/03/21/a-pair-of-brutal-anti-wall-street-op-eds-in-the-nyt/ […]

  4. bitcoin evolution commented on Oct 01

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 61415 additional Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/03/21/a-pair-of-brutal-anti-wall-street-op-eds-in-the-nyt/ […]

  5. immediate edge reviews commented on Oct 01

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 18497 more Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/03/21/a-pair-of-brutal-anti-wall-street-op-eds-in-the-nyt/ […]

  6. bitcoin commented on Oct 03

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/03/21/a-pair-of-brutal-anti-wall-street-op-eds-in-the-nyt/ […]

  7. Top Agency Hong Kong posted on Oct 10

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/03/21/a-pair-of-brutal-anti-wall-street-op-eds-in-the-nyt/ […]

  8. Dank Carts commented on Oct 13

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 25078 additional Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/03/21/a-pair-of-brutal-anti-wall-street-op-eds-in-the-nyt/ […]

Read this next.