A Look at Health Care Coverage Numbers in the US

In the current battle over health care, you will hear a lot more of a ruckus over WHO is covered as opposed to much about the quality of coverage.  As a result, a lot of the debate is based on which politician is supplying the numbers themselves.

Here’s a look at the government’s data from the St. Louis Fed:

Below is the population of the US with coverage (255 million people), the number works out to around 85%…

Population Covered by Health Insurance

Population Covered by Health Insurance

And then we see the percentage of those who are not covered (15% ish)…

Population not covered by insurance

Population Not Covered by Health Insurance

I don’t do a lot of political stuff here on TRB, but I feel compelled to add in my own two cents on the topic.  To me, I’m ok with a private system, provided that this system is based on reality and affordability.  For most Americans not working for a Fortune 500 company, to even use the term “affordable” would be a joke. 

The price of virtually every service and product has declined in price over the last 18 months.  Health care costs have increased, especially for small business owners and employees.

Competition across state lines would be one private insurance system solution, but here’s where we see the insurance companies for what they really are: Pigs.  They wrap themselves in the American flag and claim that their market should be capitalist and free, but the last thing they truly want is freedom – what they really want is to maintain their little feifdoms. 

They don’t want to compete because they can’t…the product and service they offer sucks too much.

Where’s Apple when you need someone to revolutionize a business and cater to the consumer?

Sources:

St. Louis Federal Reserve

Tags: , ,

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. taxi to airport from cheltenham commented on Sep 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/10/21/a-look-at-health-care-coverage-numbers-in-the-us/ […]

  2. Sweet hampers commented on Sep 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 2800 additional Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/10/21/a-look-at-health-care-coverage-numbers-in-the-us/ […]

  3. porn movie commented on Oct 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/10/21/a-look-at-health-care-coverage-numbers-in-the-us/ […]

  4. nằm mơ thấy cháy rừng commented on Dec 20

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 79045 additional Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/10/21/a-look-at-health-care-coverage-numbers-in-the-us/ […]

  5. rbc login banking commented on Jan 09

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/10/21/a-look-at-health-care-coverage-numbers-in-the-us/ […]

  6. login tangerine commented on Jan 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/10/21/a-look-at-health-care-coverage-numbers-in-the-us/ […]

  7. DevSecOps commented on Jan 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/10/21/a-look-at-health-care-coverage-numbers-in-the-us/ […]

  8. Regression Testing commented on Jan 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/10/21/a-look-at-health-care-coverage-numbers-in-the-us/ […]

  9. cvv hight balance commented on Jan 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/10/21/a-look-at-health-care-coverage-numbers-in-the-us/ […]