This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.
The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.
References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.
Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers
Please see disclosures here.
Yeah, some of those make me nostalgic for the days when all news reporting sounded like it had been run through the Web Economy Bulls**t Generator (on dack.com). At least there was a little more variety to the hackneyed verbiage.
TRB: I remember those days too! My fave was Price to Eyeballs as a metric for valuing Lycos or some other ridiculous POS. LOL
Yeah, some of those make me nostalgic for the days when all news reporting sounded like it had been run through the Web Economy Bulls**t Generator (on dack.com). At least there was a little more variety to the hackneyed verbiage.
TRB: I remember those days too! My fave was Price to Eyeballs as a metric for valuing Lycos or some other ridiculous POS. LOL
Yeah, some of those make me nostalgic for the days when all news reporting sounded like it had been run through the Web Economy Bulls**t Generator (on dack.com). At least there was a little more variety to the hackneyed verbiage.
TRB: I remember those days too! My fave was Price to Eyeballs as a metric for valuing Lycos or some other ridiculous POS. LOL
I nominate this fab five:
1. New paradigm
2. (marketing/financial/technical) guru
3. Cutting edge technology
4. Best in class
5. The New Economy
I nominate this fab five:
1. New paradigm
2. (marketing/financial/technical) guru
3. Cutting edge technology
4. Best in class
5. The New Economy
I nominate this fab five:
1. New paradigm
2. (marketing/financial/technical) guru
3. Cutting edge technology
4. Best in class
5. The New Economy
Yeah, makes me nostalgic too – for the days when I was employed. Add to the list “customer centric” and “organizational redesign”.
Yeah, makes me nostalgic too – for the days when I was employed. Add to the list “customer centric” and “organizational redesign”.
Yeah, makes me nostalgic too – for the days when I was employed. Add to the list “customer centric” and “organizational redesign”.
You’ve missed the most obnoxious, redundant, asinine one of all….. “going forward”
Think about it. Can you go sideways or backwards in time? Not unless you’re an H G Wells character
Some pissant pundit on Wall St Week or Bloomberg pontificated ‘going forward’ a few years ago. Now every wannabe financial authority parrots it.
One of your tweeters above used another big cliched malapropism, most common to the quasi-literate, texting, creole and pidgin english enthusiasts…”LOL”
A third one is not exactly a cliche, but a stark totalitarian warning for Canadians in particular. I first saw it in a tiny news item in the 1960s. “The Bejing Police arrested the demonstrators for yelling ‘incorrect’
slogans”.
TRB: Good eye, definitelty missed some of these. The use of LOL was my own…can’t help it, I love my shortcuts, as inane as they may be. Thx for reading.
You’ve missed the most obnoxious, redundant, asinine one of all….. “going forward”
Think about it. Can you go sideways or backwards in time? Not unless you’re an H G Wells character
Some pissant pundit on Wall St Week or Bloomberg pontificated ‘going forward’ a few years ago. Now every wannabe financial authority parrots it.
One of your tweeters above used another big cliched malapropism, most common to the quasi-literate, texting, creole and pidgin english enthusiasts…”LOL”
A third one is not exactly a cliche, but a stark totalitarian warning for Canadians in particular. I first saw it in a tiny news item in the 1960s. “The Bejing Police arrested the demonstrators for yelling ‘incorrect’
slogans”.
TRB: Good eye, definitelty missed some of these. The use of LOL was my own…can’t help it, I love my shortcuts, as inane as they may be. Thx for reading.
You’ve missed the most obnoxious, redundant, asinine one of all….. “going forward”
Think about it. Can you go sideways or backwards in time? Not unless you’re an H G Wells character
Some pissant pundit on Wall St Week or Bloomberg pontificated ‘going forward’ a few years ago. Now every wannabe financial authority parrots it.
One of your tweeters above used another big cliched malapropism, most common to the quasi-literate, texting, creole and pidgin english enthusiasts…”LOL”
A third one is not exactly a cliche, but a stark totalitarian warning for Canadians in particular. I first saw it in a tiny news item in the 1960s. “The Bejing Police arrested the demonstrators for yelling ‘incorrect’
slogans”.
TRB: Good eye, definitelty missed some of these. The use of LOL was my own…can’t help it, I love my shortcuts, as inane as they may be. Thx for reading.
“Metric” What the hell does that mean!
“Metric” What the hell does that mean!
“Metric” What the hell does that mean!