The Cramer Uptick Rule Petition

uptick-rule1

A group of market commentators from TheStreet.com, including James Cramer, have put out a petition which lobbies for the reinstatement of the original Uptick Rule, as opposed to a loophole-laden approximation filled with caveats and work-arounds as is rumored to be a possibility.

The SEC is currently seeking comment until June 19th.  There were only 27 comments received prior to the Uptick Rule being abolished in 2007, so this time, if you feel strongly, this petition gives you a way to make yourself heard.

Cramer’s co-writers on the letter are Scott Rothbort, Eric Oberg and Bill Furber, all accomplished market watchers and participants in their own right.

There are two lines of reasoning that I’ll highlight here before sending you over to read the letter in full or to sign the petition digitally if you agree with their rationale.

I would say that as a capitalist (and one who believes in a trader’s right to short), the following is the most appealing argument to me in favor of having some regulations regarding shorting stocks:

When the Uptick Rule was initially implemented in the late 1930’s, there was an implicit acknowledgement that companies were not commodities. There was recognition that the capital markets served the broader purpose of capital formation; that companies create products, provide services, employ citizens and pay taxes and thus there was an interest to promote market integrity and protect interstate commerce.

To me, this differentiation between corporations and commodities seems to be common sense, pro-business and frankly, pro-American.

The second line of reasoning I’ll mention is probably going to be the most contentious point made in this debate, amongst investors of every stripe.  It concerns the proliferation and effect of leveraged short and ultra-short ETFs:

Another question that has arisen is the proliferation of levered “short side” sector based ETFs. These funds have mushroomed with the elimination of price tests, and have raised innumerable issues in the markets..These ETFs were somehow approved by the Commission, despite seemingly obviating the margin rules set forth by the Federal Reserve..These funds have exacerbated volatility and created significant selling pressure during the downturn…The great irony is that these products, due to their construct, do not even work for longer term holders, so in reality these are speculative instruments meant for intra-day trades, not for hedging or for investment. As intra-day speculative short selling vehicles unchecked by a plus tick test, they are sopping up available liquidity, rather than providing liquidity.

This leveraged ETF section of the letter has Eric Oberg’s fingerprints all over it.  Oberg is a Goldman Sachs alum who has done a ton of homework on how these products work and he has been railing against them for the last few months.

I’m not sure that the empirical evidence presented on The Street.com or elsewhere has definitively made the case that these products have had a tremendous amount of impact on volatility, but there has been some interesting anecdotal evidence about these instruments’ involvement in deliberate manipulation.

One of the other authors of the petition, Scott Rothbort of LakeView Asset Management, has just posted this graphic of the issues that the lack of a rule has engendered this morning:

Rothbort Uptick

Whether you are a proponent of the old Uptick Rule, a new one or none at all, this petition has the entire laundry list of aspects that should be considered and is worth a read.

Full Story: Uptick Rule Letter (TSC)

Read Also: My Previous Commentary on the Uptick Rule

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. canbyte commented on Jun 06

    If you don’t like naked shorting, you have to cut the grass it hides in. All shorts start off naked – time between short sale and stock is loaned. All shorting should be abolished – it is dishonest, duplicative and destructive. Contrary to what the commissioned industry would have you believe, it is also unnecessary as the 8 month ban proved (we lived without it for 8 months, the world did not end). Markets were intended to create wealth, shorters are bent on destruction with the wealth transferred to them. If you agree all shorting should be abolished, spend a moment at

    http://www.petitiononline.com/shortNOT/petition.html

  2. canbyte commented on Jun 06

    If you don’t like naked shorting, you have to cut the grass it hides in. All shorts start off naked – time between short sale and stock is loaned. All shorting should be abolished – it is dishonest, duplicative and destructive. Contrary to what the commissioned industry would have you believe, it is also unnecessary as the 8 month ban proved (we lived without it for 8 months, the world did not end). Markets were intended to create wealth, shorters are bent on destruction with the wealth transferred to them. If you agree all shorting should be abolished, spend a moment at

    http://www.petitiononline.com/shortNOT/petition.html

  3. canbyte commented on Jun 06

    If you don’t like naked shorting, you have to cut the grass it hides in. All shorts start off naked – time between short sale and stock is loaned. All shorting should be abolished – it is dishonest, duplicative and destructive. Contrary to what the commissioned industry would have you believe, it is also unnecessary as the 8 month ban proved (we lived without it for 8 months, the world did not end). Markets were intended to create wealth, shorters are bent on destruction with the wealth transferred to them. If you agree all shorting should be abolished, spend a moment at

    http://www.petitiononline.com/shortNOT/petition.html

  4. Bitcoin Evolution Review commented on Sep 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/05/13/the-cramer-uptick-rule-petition/ […]

  5. w88 commented on Sep 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 24251 additional Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/05/13/the-cramer-uptick-rule-petition/ […]

  6. Energy Plans commented on Sep 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/05/13/the-cramer-uptick-rule-petition/ […]

  7. bitcoin evolution online commented on Oct 02

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/05/13/the-cramer-uptick-rule-petition/ […]

  8. Regression testing commented on Dec 02

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 86441 additional Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/05/13/the-cramer-uptick-rule-petition/ […]

  9. kuda poni commented on Jan 02

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/05/13/the-cramer-uptick-rule-petition/ […]

  10. CI CD Solutions commented on Jan 11

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 82845 additional Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/05/13/the-cramer-uptick-rule-petition/ […]

  11. buy adderalls online commented on Jan 13

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/05/13/the-cramer-uptick-rule-petition/ […]

  12. replica rolex commented on Jan 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/05/13/the-cramer-uptick-rule-petition/ […]

  13. tangerine online log-in commented on Jan 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/05/13/the-cramer-uptick-rule-petition/ […]

  14. site to buy dumps with pin commented on Jan 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/05/13/the-cramer-uptick-rule-petition/ […]