The Ener1 Situation is Exactly Why We Suck

Charles Gassenheimer & the Gang:  Political Victims?

Charles Gassenheimer & the Gang: Political Victims?

I haven’t made many recommendations for clients in alternative energy stocks because a lot of the names that look commercially viable just seem too far away from profitability or are subject to drastic margin erosion (solar stocks, anyone?). I guess I’d rather be late but at least be involved in something proven.

I read about Ener1 (HEV), a New York City and Indiana-based company that may be our best hope for American-made electric cars, for the first time today in Barron’s.

When I read about the headwinds facing this American company with tremendous promise, I became nauseated with the political hand-wringing that seems to come with the territory these days.

The conundrum over Ener1 is as follows:

The company has a shot at a $2 billion plus market opportunity to build advanced batteries for hybrid electric vehicles, many of which will be engineered and assembled here in the U.S. if all goes according to plan.

They are in the running for almost $500 million of government development money under Obama‘s green initiative/ stimulus plan.

The company is being jerked around because a lot of the stock ownership is controlled by a pair of Russian oligarchs, who came up with the cash to save the company in its treacherous early development stage.

This is the kind of nonsense that goes a long way toward explaining why we don’t have a manufacturing and industrial base here in the U.S. anymore, why engineers and scientists are rockin’ and rollin’ overseas while we throw money and incentives at other industries (like bailing out finance companies).

When you think about the trillions going to f@#$ed up insurance companies and investment banks and then you hear about a potentially world-altering step forward in American technology that’s having trouble getting financed, it makes you want to pull your hair out of your head.

If this company can design and build, domestically, a product that helps with the environment and alleviates some of our dependence on Middle Eastern fossil fuels, why is it’s grant still stuck in committee or in a due diligence process? Because it has passive shareholders in Russia? As though we didn’t recruit Nazi rocket scientists and Japanese war profiteers after WWII.

Give me a break. If these guys have something promising, give them the money! Divert a half of 1% of the TARP funds, that by the way, have not demonstrably done anything to juice lending, and let’s finance some homegrown industrial activity that could benefit all of us.

According to Barron’s, the company has made the first cut of those vying for a total of $2 billion under the plan, from 75 companies to 25.  I can only hope that the deciders judge Ener1’s proposal on its merits, not the makeup of it’s shareholder base.

Full Story:  Powering Up…Or Down (Barron’s)

Full Disclosure:  I have no positions in HEV and do not plan to trade the stock for customers in the near future.  Further, I do not use this blog to make financial recommendations to anyone, so be sure to check out the Terms & Conditions page before acting on anything you read here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Harold Jahn Utah commented on Dec 19

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: […]

  2. Functional testing commented on Dec 19

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]

  3. diamond art kits commented on Dec 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: […]

  4. tangerine canada commented on Jan 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: […]

  5. wigs for women commented on Jan 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]

  6. DevOps solutions commented on Feb 04

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]