The Ener1 Situation is Exactly Why We Suck

Charles Gassenheimer & the Gang:  Political Victims?

Charles Gassenheimer & the Gang: Political Victims?

I haven’t made many recommendations for clients in alternative energy stocks because a lot of the names that look commercially viable just seem too far away from profitability or are subject to drastic margin erosion (solar stocks, anyone?). I guess I’d rather be late but at least be involved in something proven.

I read about Ener1 (HEV), a New York City and Indiana-based company that may be our best hope for American-made electric cars, for the first time today in Barron’s.

When I read about the headwinds facing this American company with tremendous promise, I became nauseated with the political hand-wringing that seems to come with the territory these days.

The conundrum over Ener1 is as follows:

The company has a shot at a $2 billion plus market opportunity to build advanced batteries for hybrid electric vehicles, many of which will be engineered and assembled here in the U.S. if all goes according to plan.

They are in the running for almost $500 million of government development money under Obama‘s green initiative/ stimulus plan.

The company is being jerked around because a lot of the stock ownership is controlled by a pair of Russian oligarchs, who came up with the cash to save the company in its treacherous early development stage.

This is the kind of nonsense that goes a long way toward explaining why we don’t have a manufacturing and industrial base here in the U.S. anymore, why engineers and scientists are rockin’ and rollin’ overseas while we throw money and incentives at other industries (like bailing out finance companies).

When you think about the trillions going to f@#$ed up insurance companies and investment banks and then you hear about a potentially world-altering step forward in American technology that’s having trouble getting financed, it makes you want to pull your hair out of your head.

If this company can design and build, domestically, a product that helps with the environment and alleviates some of our dependence on Middle Eastern fossil fuels, why is it’s grant still stuck in committee or in a due diligence process? Because it has passive shareholders in Russia? As though we didn’t recruit Nazi rocket scientists and Japanese war profiteers after WWII.

Give me a break. If these guys have something promising, give them the money! Divert a half of 1% of the TARP funds, that by the way, have not demonstrably done anything to juice lending, and let’s finance some homegrown industrial activity that could benefit all of us.

According to Barron’s, the company has made the first cut of those vying for a total of $2 billion under the plan, from 75 companies to 25.  I can only hope that the deciders judge Ener1’s proposal on its merits, not the makeup of it’s shareholder base.

Full Story:  Powering Up…Or Down (Barron’s)

Full Disclosure:  I have no positions in HEV and do not plan to trade the stock for customers in the near future.  Further, I do not use this blog to make financial recommendations to anyone, so be sure to check out the Terms & Conditions page before acting on anything you read here.

Tags: , , , , , ,

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Harold Jahn Utah commented on Dec 19

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: […]

  2. Functional testing commented on Dec 19

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]

  3. diamond art kits commented on Dec 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: […]

  4. tangerine canada commented on Jan 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: […]

  5. wigs for women commented on Jan 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]

  6. DevOps solutions commented on Feb 04

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]