Were the Feeder Funds in on the Madoff Scam?

Calls them like he see's them

Ace: calls them like he see's them

There’s a great scene in the movie “Casino” where Ace Rothstein (Robert DeNiro) has to fire a local young man named Don Ward, who is responsible for supervising a slot machine that pays out multiple times in a short span:

Don Ward: You might regret this, Mr. Rothstein.

Ace Rothstein: I’ll regret it even more if I keep you on.

Don Ward: This is not the way to treat people.

Ace Rothstein: Listen, if you didn’t know you’re bein’ scammed, you’re too f%$@in’ dumb to keep this job. If you did know, you were in on it. Either way, you’re out. Get out! Go on.

To me, this sums up the argument of whether or not the feeder funds, including Tremont Advisors or the Fairfield Greenwich Group, were in on the Madoff scam.

If they didn’t know what was going on, then they were too stupid to justify the incredibly huge fees they were taking for their “due diligence”.  They should be forced to give back every penny.  If you say you’re going to do something, then charge a fortune without actually doing it…this is stealing, n’est-ce pas? How is this different from a house painter who gets paid and never shows up to actually paint the house?

The other side of the coin is that they were not so stupid and they knew what was happening.  If that’s the case, then we should ask the National Museum of France to borrow a guillotine and a technician or two.

That’s really what it boils down to;  They’re either complete idiots and negligent to a fault or they’re aiders and abettors.  Either way, if I were Fairfield Greenwich‘s Walter Noel, I’d make like Peter Madoff (brother and compliance officer to Chief Lowlife) and buy a primary residence in Florida before it’s too late.  One way or the other, he’s at fault.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. concrete depot commented on Dec 12

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 7166 additional Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/02/04/were-the-feeder-funds-in-on-the-madoff-scam/ […]

  2. bmo online banking sign in page commented on Jan 12

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 55458 more Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/02/04/were-the-feeder-funds-in-on-the-madoff-scam/ […]

  3. Vivotek FD8134 manuals commented on Jan 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 71303 additional Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/02/04/were-the-feeder-funds-in-on-the-madoff-scam/ […]

  4. dumps with pin legit commented on Feb 06

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 53433 additional Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/02/04/were-the-feeder-funds-in-on-the-madoff-scam/ […]