Rules-based tactical vs wizardry and witchcraft

Not a day goes by where I don’t give thanks to Providence for placing me in a position to be doing something I believe in for a living. it wasn’t always thus.

Today, a major Wall Street investment bank released a report in which they downgrade the outlook for US stocks for the next 3 months.

Here’s Goldman Sachs, in a nutshell:

Our risk appetite indicator is near neutral levels and its positive momentum has faded, suggesting positioning will give less support and we will need better macro fundamentals or stimulus to keep the risk rally going, but market expectations are already dovish and growth pick-up should take time.

As a result, we downgrade equities tactically to Underweight over 3 months, but remain Neutral over 12 months. We remain Overweight cash and would look for resets lower in equities to add positions.

Translation: “Maybe stocks will fall and you should buy them if they do.”

I don’t even know what to say about something like this. Is it possible that people are actually placing trades based on someone’s feelings and selective interpretation of a narrow slice of data might lead to the ability foresee 90 days worth of random stock market activity?

There are myriad concerns in the market these days surrounding the fact that, with record low bond yields and high stock prices, a diversified portfolio may not shield a traditional asset allocation portfolio from a drop. We agree, which is why we manage a tactical model alongside a strategic model for many of our clients. Our tactical model is rules-based and is only as good as our fidelity to the rules allows it to be. These other inputs have to be tuned out in order for it to work.

Should we step off the ledge and start reacting to these kinds of “It’s going to be a rough 90 days because of post-Brexit positioning and risk appetites and valuations and economic growth data and the expectations therein and etc, etc, etc” then. surely, we would be back in the land of Wizardry and Witchcraft that I spent more than a decade learning to escape from.

But we will not play that game with our money or other people’s money. It’s better to accept the possibility of short-term volatility than to jeopardize the long-term on a quest with the seers and shamans of The Street.

 

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Slow grind records | Vestact's – Quirk with quark commented on Aug 10

    […] term, when the market plus back it may not feel good but you can still sleep well at night – Rules-based tactical vs wizardry and witchcraft. If you don’t know your goals and time frames before hand, statements like this will scare […]

  2. Diruangan classrom | aperiusndruru commented on Oct 28

    […] players and teams has been found wanting, not that those whose day has passed, committed to wizardry and witchcraft as they are, have recognized […]

  3. bitcoin evolution review commented on Sep 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]

  4. breakfree trading algorithm review commented on Sep 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 96664 more Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]

  5. is 7lab pharma store legit commented on Oct 08

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]

  6. 안전놀이터 commented on Oct 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]

  7. https://pendaftaran.sscnbkn.win/ commented on Nov 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 20036 additional Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]

  8. 안전공원 commented on Dec 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]

  9. replique montre commented on Jan 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 93120 more Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]

  10. bmo online business commented on Jan 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]

  11. Brazino commented on Feb 04

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]