Should We Be Worried About Margin Debt?

The absolute level of margin debt is a traditional boogeyman the bears like to pull out from time to time. This is because large numbers – especially record large numbers – tend to get people’s attention and everyone knows that debt is “bad” or indicates too much optimism / speculative fervor.

But the bears have a point. Margin levels can be an indicator that the party’s gone on too long or has gotten way to aggressive. The thing is, it’s not absolute margin dollar amounts we should be looking at (of course they’ll be high when the market’s gone up!), it’s actually the rate of change and the confirming or non-confirming price action in the market itself that could make margin debt a crucial tell. Unfortunately, this cannot be done in real-time, so using margin debt (or any other indicator) to pick an exact stock market top as it happens is not ever going to be possible. There are people who claim they can for $19.95 a month (plus a free tote bag!), but if you’re reading my blog I assume you already know better.

Here’s a look at margin debt from Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s ace technician Stephen Suttmeier, via his giant year-in-preview piece “Welcome to 2015″…

Margin debt: Below the Feb 2014 peak & 12-month ROC not at an extreme
Margin debt is a gauge of market sentiment and positioning. As of November 2014 NYSE margin debt stood at $457b (just below February’s record high of $466b). While the absolute level of margin debt is a source of investor concern, the YoY rate of change (RoC) is lackluster at 7.9% and did not test the extremes near 78% and 68% that accompanied the S&P 500 peaks in 2007 and 2000, respectively. One concern is that margin debt topped out ahead of the S&P 500 on a monthly closing basis in 2007 (4-month lead for margin debt) and 2000 (5-month lead) and this preceded a steep market decline. Since NYSE margin debt remains below its February 2014 peak, the 2014 rally in the S&P 500 between February and November did not occur with an increase in leverage. The same thing happened moving into the 2007 and 2000 peaks and preceded a market drop.

Screen Shot 2015-01-13 at 9.08.59 AM

Source:

Welcome to 2015 
Bank of America Merrill Lynch – January 13th 2015

Full Disclosure: Nothing on this site should ever be considered to be advice, research or an invitation to buy or sell any securities, please see my Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Top Newsstuffs (January 12-18) | The Buttonwood Tree commented on Jan 18

    […] Should we be worried about margin debt: Another way to look at the NYSE’s data | Technical Str… Overlaying measures of margin debt with SPX, BAML looks for signals in divergences: – Conclusion: SPX’s nominal higher-highs have not been confirmed by either margin debt’s 12-month rate-of-change (ROC) or nominal levels, which both negatively diverged 2/2014 [Previously: NYSE margin debt still bearish (November 2014)] #Neutralizing #Myth buster #Unconventional wisdom #Tortured rationalization? […]

  2. Margin Debt Really Does Matter commented on May 06

    […] to dismiss the record level of margin debt in the market as meaningless. Notable bloggers like Josh Brown, Barry Ritholtz and Chris Kimble have all written some sort of “it just doesn’t matter” […]

CFT_Banner

Read this next.