A reasonable explanation for the upward tilt of US stock PE ratios

One of my whip-smart readers, Cathy Leow, wrote in a really interesting take to explain the gradual and undeniable upward tilt for the PE ratios of US stocks in recent years. Cathy was formerly an economist and then a grains trader, she’s been analyzing and investing in the equity markets since 2005.

I thought this was really smart and great food for thought, what do you think? Because if she’s right, it might require a rethinking of the where we think secular bear markets need to bottom and where they truly become historically expensive…

***

Josh – you asked a question of a fund manager during Fast Money lunchtime edition he couldn’t answer.  You asked “why should the S&P 500 trade at a premium to its long term historical valuation?”

I believe I have the answer.

We can’t look at long term historical valuations because the tax code has changed dramatically.  Prior to 2003 dividends were taxed at ordinary income levels, so for the highest two or three brackets fixed income was as valuable as the dividend at the same yield. Today, at the same yield, dividends are far more attractive since fixed income is taxed at a higher rate for the upper brackets. Additionally, prior to 1982, capital gains taxes were generally higher (as were the dividend tax rates because marginal tax rates were much higher).

Ergo, because of the tax code there should be a rerating higher of p/e levels over the past 30 years relative to prior to that time. And a further upward boost in 2003  – especially for dividend paying stocks.  Whether the level for the S&P 500 should be 17, 18 or more versus the long term historical average of 15 is something for the statisticians to debate.

Unfortunately there are other factors, such as earnings  growth and interest rates that also influence the multiple and pinpointing what the exact level should be is probably impossible. But 15 looks too cheap when taxes and current returns from fixed income are considered.

I had this epiphany a couple weeks ago while looking at a long term chart of historical p/e’s and noticed the upward bias over the past decade or so and was wondering why this happened.  The proverbial lightbulb went on in my brain when thinking about the changes  in how dividends have been taxed in more recent history.  Frankly I’m surprised this hasn’t gotten more attention.  And it also makes me wonder whether the hated utilities and other defensive sectors are really overpriced, especially as long as fixed income returns are so meager, and are likely to remain that way for awhile longer.

***

Thanks Cathy!

So? Is she onto something? 

 

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. bulletproof domain commented on Sep 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/11/01/a-reasonable-explanation-for-the-upward-tilt-of-us-stock-pe-ratios/ […]

  2. EatVerts commented on Sep 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/11/01/a-reasonable-explanation-for-the-upward-tilt-of-us-stock-pe-ratios/ […]

  3. 안전놀이터 commented on Oct 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/11/01/a-reasonable-explanation-for-the-upward-tilt-of-us-stock-pe-ratios/ […]

  4. Earn Fast Cash Now commented on Nov 03

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/11/01/a-reasonable-explanation-for-the-upward-tilt-of-us-stock-pe-ratios/ […]

  5. Performance Test Automation commented on Nov 12

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 45993 additional Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/11/01/a-reasonable-explanation-for-the-upward-tilt-of-us-stock-pe-ratios/ […]

  6. cc shop legit commented on Nov 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/11/01/a-reasonable-explanation-for-the-upward-tilt-of-us-stock-pe-ratios/ […]

  7. cvvdumps shop commented on Nov 20

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/11/01/a-reasonable-explanation-for-the-upward-tilt-of-us-stock-pe-ratios/ […]

  8. td trust login commented on Nov 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/11/01/a-reasonable-explanation-for-the-upward-tilt-of-us-stock-pe-ratios/ […]

  9. Call Now commented on Dec 11

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/11/01/a-reasonable-explanation-for-the-upward-tilt-of-us-stock-pe-ratios/ […]

  10. buy adderalls online commented on Jan 13

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/11/01/a-reasonable-explanation-for-the-upward-tilt-of-us-stock-pe-ratios/ […]

  11. fake rolex for sale commented on Jan 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/11/01/a-reasonable-explanation-for-the-upward-tilt-of-us-stock-pe-ratios/ […]

  12. personal online banking scotiabank commented on Jan 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/11/01/a-reasonable-explanation-for-the-upward-tilt-of-us-stock-pe-ratios/ […]

  13. like this commented on Feb 03

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/11/01/a-reasonable-explanation-for-the-upward-tilt-of-us-stock-pe-ratios/ […]