Not Depth…Duration

There’s a bumper crop in superlatives these days, The biggest weekly increase in initial jobless claims in history. The fastest 30% drawdown in history. The worst daily Dow Jones point loss ever. It goes on and on. We are living through a historic moment that is rewriting the record books as we watch.

And when I talk to people on the street (via text, relax) who aren’t obsessing over daily stock market minutiae, the question on everyone’s mind is “How bad is it going to get?” They’re asking me about the economy or their 401(k) accounts, I highly doubt they’re asking me about the spread of the disease – after all, I only have two areas of unquestionable expertise: Investor sentiment and Italian food.

But the point I want to make is that there are two perspectives on “How bad is it going to get?”

If you ask that question of a hospital administrator or a state’s governor or a doctor or a nurse, the answer to that question would likely have to do with the depth of the crisis. The depth – as in “How many infections? How high will the death rate go? How high will the death count rise? How many recoveries? How many ventilators are we short? How many hospital beds will we need? How many people will be out of work? How high will the unemployment rate rise?”

These are depth questions. Questions of how far we’ll fall in these categories before it’s over.

But for Wall Street, the Fed, investors and fund managers – to whom all of these questions are also important – I would argue that the depth will matter much less than the duration. We all know the economy is going down big. Has gone down big. But the stock market is a discounting mechanism. Its participants make forward-looking bets based on how they feel about the future. But we don’t have any evidence yet of what the future is going to look like, because we have not yet seen an end to the spread, or the death count. We haven’t seen the peak of expenditures or emergency actions.

Investors will be willing to bet on what the world looks like after, but only when there’s a sense of the When. These are duration questions: “When will people be back to work? When will the extraordinary stimulus and monetary policy begin to be felt. When are the peaks for infection and death in each region of the country? When will shuttered businesses begin to reopen. How long will it take for laid off workers to get hired again?”

Investors are thinking in terms of how much longer while others think in terms of how much worse. These aren’t totally distinct questions, however; there is a great deal of overlap. When one is attempting to calculate the severity of the crisis, she must also consider its length, and vice versa.

I don’t think it’s true that investors would trade a worse depth for a shorter duration, as has been suggested by the “Go back to work, life will go on” crowd. I’m sure there are some who feel that way, but probably not the majority of people.

Just as there are no answers to the depth question – How bad will this get? – there are also no answers to the duration question – When will this be over?. We all can make guesses, but I think absent a peak in some of the depth issues, it would be impossible to gauge the potential duration.

The fog this creates lends itself to continued volatility. I would like to think we’ve seen most of it, but I’m not so sure.




This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. bitcoin loophole review 2020 commented on Sep 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: […]

  2. facebook old design commented on Sep 25

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]

  3. orangeville real estate agents commented on Oct 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: […]

  4. Find Out More commented on Dec 11

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: […]

  5. ILuv Remote controls manuals commented on Jan 19

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here to that Topic: […]

  6. wig commented on Jan 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 9958 additional Information on that Topic: […]