The Mosaic is a Trap

One of the biggest investment charlatans I’ve ever come into contact with has this thing where he decides whether or not he is bearish or bullish (usually bearish), and then throws together every data point and anecdote and economic reading he can find to create his “mosaic.”

He uses it like a cudgel to reinforce whatever view his gut already had in mind. He is almost always bearishly biased because his handful of claim-to-fame calls were mostly of the bearish variety – the brain craves the same particular secretion of pleasure chemicals that it has already experienced, much like you long to hear that favorite song you had in high school. Nothing feels better than the satisfaction of watching everyone lose money just after you’d been warning them. It’s a pure MDMA high.

Anyway, when I was younger and reading his stuff, I was always very impressed at the sheer command he had of thousands of little tidbits and scraps of information with which he would construct the mosaic.

As I grew older, it occurred to me that he was just artlessly splattering paint on a canvas. Leaving out the stuff that didn’t fit and randomly including whatever bolstered his case.

He’d say technicals were nonsense, unless they lined up in accordance with his views – and then all of a sudden there would be a heavy emphasis on charts. He vacillate between valuation screeds and Federal Reserve doomery, drawing false analogies and non-sequitur comparisons. One minute he was a macroeconomist, the next minute he was taking deep dives into the balance sheets of consumer staple companies, and then somehow connecting the two things along to form an ironclad case for why everyone needed to buy or sell this or that thing. All the while keeping no scorecard whatsoever about how any of these mosaic updates from past weeks and months had played out.

And worse than any of this, he would be relentless with people who disagreed with him, calling them out by name and blasting out mass emails designed to embarrass them or shame them into agreement.

I once fell into this trap here on the blog back in the fall of 2011. I began to chronicle all of the terrible news and data coming from Europe and the US and allowing the sheer width and weight of it to crush my ability to remain open-minded. When the bull market resumed around Christmas that year, I had gotten myself so twisted around this idiotic mosaic of mine that it took months for me unwind it in my mind.

If you want to see it, the most embarrassing thing I’ve ever done on this site, I’ve left it up as a sort of self-flagellation. It’s also a good reminder that haphazardly collecting a stew of bullish or bearish facts is both a waste of time and a dangerous exercise for investors.

I’m older and wiser now (I hope), and no longer impressed with who can fling the most spaghetti at the wall, from the most randomly selected sources, and then point to it, screaming like a chimpanzee.

I’m a lot more impressed with people who can reduce and discard and still feel as though they’ve got a robust enough investment philosophy, despite a lack of bells and whistles and indicators and special effects. These are the people I try to emulate nowadays. Maybe I had to learn this lesson the old fashioned way.

I came across this cartoon from XKCD this morning about machine learning. It’s a pretty good way to think about overstuffed mosaics full of random information…

Collecting information and staying informed about what’s going on is our duty as investors. Even if the majority of what we’ve collected is only helpful insofar as it provides context. I think about how much stuff Todd and Ted are reading each morning in Omaha while putting almost none of it directly to use in the traditional sense – this is laudable. I’m jealous, actually.

On the other hand, creating mosaics to back up a pre-existing bias and then hammering people with them is a trap. It’s the most certain path to irrelevance and a recipe for bitterness.



This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. w88 commented on Sep 20

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: […]

  2. w88 commented on Sep 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here on that Topic: […]

  3. bitcoin loophole review commented on Sep 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 9991 additional Information to that Topic: […]

  4. immediate edge commented on Oct 04

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here on that Topic: […]

  5. DevOps Consultants in Dallas commented on Nov 05

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 83197 additional Info to that Topic: […]

  6. Bilåtervinning Uddevalla commented on Jan 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here on that Topic: […]