My Silver Bonafides

Now that everyone and their mother and their mother’s manicurist is talking about silver, I thought today would be a good time to trot out my own Silver Bonafides.  Long-time readers know that I introduced the concept of the Silver Slingshot Effect into the financial blogosphere a year and a half ago.

In my May 2009 post “Rise of the Silver Surfer“, I explained the sling shot effect thusly:

Let’s talk valuation.  An ounce of gold had historically traded at a ratio of around 15 to 1 versus an ounce of silver for many decades.  This was not a man-made ratio; there is, in fact, roughly 15 times the amount of silver as there is gold in the earth’s crust, so this ratio was more of a geological truism.  Gresham’s Law, however, brought this ratio into focus; Named for a Tudor-era English financier, the law held that as either gold or silver got ahead of itself in price, you could just buy the other one as a form of arbitrage, so this 15 to 1 thing was fairly solid.  That all changed between the 1960’s and 1980, a period of time during which silver was largely de-monetized.

The yellow metal is trading at around $950 an ounce as of this post and silver’s at slightly above $14.  The gap right now between gold and silver shouldn’t be anywhere close to that historical 15 to 1 spread, but should it really be at 70 to 1?  The smart money may be looking for a reversion to the mean with the gap this wide.  There could be a ton of ground for silver to cover while narrowing that gap, and that brings me to the exciting part…The Slingshot Effect!

At current gold prices on the spot market of around $950 an ounce, a more traditional ratio of 50 to 1 would look more like $20 plus for an ounce of silver, a gain of 40% in the commodity itself.  Now, picture the price of gold finally cracking above the $1000/ oz mark that it’s been flirting with for a year…and staying up there!  The torrent of buying that could come in would probably be ferocious enough to wrench the price of silver higher at a much faster rate than gold, as silver is a much smaller market.

It’s been posited that the silver market is so tight and unaccustomed to speculators (compared to the gold market), that if someone calls for physical delivery of the metal (which a contract enables them to do) the entire mechanism could break down, triggering an explosion in prices due to the physical scarcity.

Picture the stored potential energy of one end of a rubber band being held back (representing silver prices) as the other end of the rubber band is being pulled forward (gold prices).  The further you stretch the “gold” end of that rubber band, the more the potential snap you’re going to get when you finally release the silver end.  That’s what we could be looking at with a 70 to 1 gold to silver ratio and a tight market with few ways to get exposure.  That’s the Slingshot Effect.

Gold is within spitting distance of it’s 2008 peak price as well as it’s all-time high price.  Silver, on the other hand, has been cut in half from it’s 2008 high.  As far as the all-time high for silver?  We’re talking $50 back in 1980, not adjusted for inflation.

In that same post, I also mentioned my favorite silver play, Silver Wheaton ($SLW), which I called “the miner without a mine”.  The stock was around 8 or 10 back then, now in the mid-30’s.

One other item I’ll point you to is Barry’s hysterical post this morning about how Quantitative Mining is “debasing the gold currency”.  Gold priced in Silver looks like the US Dollar these days.  Love it.


Rise of the Silver Surfer (TRB)

Quantitative Mining Debasing Gold (TBP)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. online dating commented on Oct 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]

  2. orangeville real estate agents commented on Oct 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here to that Topic: […]

  3. kids swimming commented on Dec 31

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]

  4. wigs commented on Jan 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 68113 additional Information on that Topic: […]

  5. sign-in tangerine commented on Jan 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]