NJ Pension Officials Don’t Understand the Relationship Between Risk and Reward

The State of New Jersey is paying some $600 million in annual fees to hedge funds and private equity firms to have large portions of their pension system’s funds managed.

The rationale behind pushing into hedge funds in 2010 was that traditional portfolio strategies weren’t going to work anymore and hedge funds would add several percentage points to annual performance.

A 2010 memo by the State Investment Council’s consulting firm said “alternative investments have significantly outperformed public markets on a risk-adjusted basis, and we believe they will continue to do so over the long term.” Grady argued the strategy would “maximize returns while appropriately managing risk.” And Institutional Investor magazine reported that the state’s hedge-fund consultant “predicts that the pension could earn an additional 3 percent return above traditional asset classes from a diversified portfolio of alternatives.”

Of course, in the five years since then, the exact opposite has been true – both stocks and bonds (traditional asset allocation) have ripped the cover off the ball while a plain vanilla 529 Plan has crushed the hedge fund indices.

New Jersey’s new rationale for having a large allocation to hedge funds has changed over the last five years now that the original thesis failed. These days, instead of talking about above-average returns, they’ve shifted to the always convenient “risk management” and “volatility reduction” pitch:

Facing intensifying scrutiny of high fees and weak returns, New Jersey pension officials have defended their push into alternatives by claiming those assets are designed to reduce volatility and hedge against downturns. That rationale, though, is a marked shift: when Christie officials originally began plowing more retirees’ money into Wall Street firms, Christie’s administration and their financial consultants promoted the move as a way to boost returns over and above those that could be gleaned from low-fee stocks and bonds.

It’s clear to me that NJ’s financial consultants do not understand the relationship between risk and return. Hence the mission creep.

Higher returns than the stock and bond markets offer requires greater than average risk. It requires concentrated positions, financial leverage or savvy market timing. Otherwise, it isn’t possible. Lower than average risk means lower returns – but that can be achieved with a much more low-cost set of tools.

So which is it – are you using private equity and hedge funds to beat the market or to lower volatility? Can’t have both at the same time, especially not when you’re paying performance fees on top of (or instead of) the alpha that may or may not be generated.

One can easily use a low-cost diversified portfolio to achieve a lower risk, lower return objective without having money locked up in private investments. It just means the committee meetings will be less interesting and there’ll be significantly less beard stroking.

Source:

Chris Christie Aides Stalling Probe Of Pension Fees Paid To Wall Street: NJ Pension Chief (International Business Times)

 

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. full coverage diamond painting kits commented on Sep 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/07/23/nj-pension-officials-dont-understand-the-relationship-between-risk-and-reward/ […]

  2. Egypt holidays commented on Sep 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/07/23/nj-pension-officials-dont-understand-the-relationship-between-risk-and-reward/ […]

  3. Bitcoin Era Review 2020 commented on Oct 01

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/07/23/nj-pension-officials-dont-understand-the-relationship-between-risk-and-reward/ […]

  4. Cannabis Oil for Sale commented on Oct 13

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/07/23/nj-pension-officials-dont-understand-the-relationship-between-risk-and-reward/ […]

  5. fake golf watches commented on Oct 30

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/07/23/nj-pension-officials-dont-understand-the-relationship-between-risk-and-reward/ […]

  6. sigma vape shop commented on Oct 30

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/07/23/nj-pension-officials-dont-understand-the-relationship-between-risk-and-reward/ […]

  7. perwira karir polisi 2021 commented on Nov 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/07/23/nj-pension-officials-dont-understand-the-relationship-between-risk-and-reward/ […]

  8. DevOps solution commented on Nov 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/07/23/nj-pension-officials-dont-understand-the-relationship-between-risk-and-reward/ […]

  9. 안전공원 commented on Dec 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/07/23/nj-pension-officials-dont-understand-the-relationship-between-risk-and-reward/ […]

  10. lace front wigs commented on Jan 20

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/07/23/nj-pension-officials-dont-understand-the-relationship-between-risk-and-reward/ […]

  11. bandar togel commented on Jan 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/07/23/nj-pension-officials-dont-understand-the-relationship-between-risk-and-reward/ […]