Nonsense Forecasts

I was on TV the other day next to a guy who goes, totally matter-of-factly: “We should get 8 percent earnings growth for the S&P 500 in 2014 and earnings drive stock market returns so I expect to see an 8ish percent return for the market this year.” My jaw dropped. I don’t even want to tell you how much actual money he manages for people in real life. It’s disturbing.

But only disturbing to me. Everyone else seemed okay with both the forecast and the basis upon which it had been formulated, no questions asked. Maybe I’m the freak. I need to learn to nod my head, I guess. By the way, 8% isn’t very far off of the average annual return for equities, so he may end up being right by accident 😉

So anyway, does earnings growth determine the returns of the stock market?

How about interest rates? Do they drive returns for stocks?

What about inflation? Or GDP growth? Or the rate of the ten-year treasury bond? Or any of the other factors used on a daily basis to predict the markets?

Well? Which one is it? Which one works?

All of them. None of them. Some of them sometimes – but then others of them other times. And usually in all different combinations. Also, they start and stop mattering randomly and with no warning. And then sometimes no combination of any of them is indicative of anything because a president is shot or a war starts or a plane hits a building or a nuclear reactor melts down during an earthquake-caused tsunami on the other side of the world.

In other words, forecasts using any combination of any of these can only ever be nonsense – even if it’s well-meaning nonsense. None of these factors can continually keep an investor on the right side of the stock market, although ignoring them altogether also won’t be able to either.

Ben Carlson is an institutional investor who writes a great new blog called A Wealth of Common Sense. He tries to distill complex topics down into key points of understanding for regular folks and pros who are interested in the truth. I love his stuff. Here he makes the same point with data that I’ve made above with my anecdote:

The following table shows the average dividend yield, company earnings growth and performance of the S&P 500 by decade along with economic growth, inflation, average interest rates and the 10 year treasury returns:

data

Some observations on this data:

  • Add up the average dividend yield and the average earnings growth (8.9%) and you get pretty close to the long-term average annual stock return (9.4%) since 1930.
  • Yet stock returns can be feast or famine depending on the decade.
  • Dividend yields have come down in recent decades, but much of this stems from a combination of rising markets and share repurchases.
  • Rising interest rates don’t necessarily have to be bad for stock returns (50s & 60s)
  • There were times when bonds outperformed stocks (30s, 00s).
  • There were long periods of negative real bond returns (40s to 70s).
  • Bonds didn’t have a single decade of negative nominal returns proving their worth as a stabilizer for the low risk part of your portfolio.
  • There were times of subdued inflation (50s-60s & 90s-present) and high inflation (40s, 70s & 80s).
  • Stocks lost out to inflation over two different decades (70s & 00s)
  • There were times when economic growth outpaced growth in company earnings (30s to 60s, 80s & 00s).
  • There were times when company earnings growth outpaced economic growth (70s, 90s, 10s).
  • Economic growth was fairly stable from the 1950s to the present time but stock returns were not.
  • Stocks lost investors money during two decade long stretches (30s & 00s).
  • Companies still paid decent dividends during those periods.
  • The 1930s were a pretty terrible decade.

Ben goes on to show that stocks have, in fact, murdered bonds in inflation-adjusted terms going back to the 1920’s at a rate of more than 3-to-1. But it is important to note that this long-term record for the market has been accumulated through a vast array of economic environments – no two are ever exactly the same.

Moreover, even when there are similarities between environments – think of the rapid earnings growth during both the 1970’s and the 1990’s – the end results can be starkly different; the 70’s couldn’t have been worse for stocks while the 90’s couldn’t have been better.

The bottom line is that it’s great to be aware of the current trends and the ability to contextualize them in terms of historic periods is probably not harmful either. So long as you’re not betting big on the predictive power of these metrics. Because it’s not different this time, it’s different every time.

Source:

The Way Way Back of Market Cycles (A Wealth of Common Sense)

Follow Ben on Twitter: @awealthofcs

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. oral orgasm commented on Jun 12

    oral orgasm

    […]Here are a number of the sites we advocate for our visitors[…]

  2. waterproof vibrator commented on Jun 13

    waterproof vibrator

    […]Here is a great Weblog You may Find Interesting that we Encourage You[…]

  3. Steuerberatung commented on Jun 13

    Steuerberatung

    […]usually posts some extremely interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[…]

  4. big island news now commented on Jun 13

    big island news now

    […]below you’ll locate the link to some internet sites that we think you ought to visit[…]

  5. pure kona coffee commented on Jun 13

    pure kona coffee

    […]Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a number of unrelated data, nonetheless genuinely really worth taking a look, whoa did a single learn about Mid East has got extra problerms too […]

  6. pure gourmet coffee commented on Jun 13

    pure gourmet coffee

    […]usually posts some incredibly intriguing stuff like this. If you are new to this site[…]

  7. علم غیب commented on Jun 14

    فال

    Good way of explaining, and fastidious article to get information relating to my presentation matter make a difference, which i am heading to express in school.

  8. interracial porn commented on Jun 14

    interracial porn

    […]always a major fan of linking to bloggers that I really like but do not get a good deal of link appreciate from[…]

  9. Baby Highchair commented on Jun 14

    Baby Highchair

    […]we came across a cool site which you could delight in. Take a look should you want[…]

  10. Uppsala veterinär commented on Jun 15

    Uppsala veterinär

    […]one of our visitors lately recommended the following website[…]

  11. strap on for plus size women commented on Jun 15

    strap on for plus size women

    […]please take a look at the web-sites we stick to, such as this 1, as it represents our picks in the web[…]

  12. deep penetration with sex toys commented on Jun 16

    deep penetration with sex toys

    […]we prefer to honor a lot of other world-wide-web sites around the web, even when they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Beneath are some webpages really worth checking out[…]

  13. Adam & Eve Magic Massager Deluxe 8x commented on Jun 16

    Adam & Eve Magic Massager Deluxe 8x

    […]very handful of internet websites that transpire to be detailed beneath, from our point of view are undoubtedly effectively really worth checking out[…]

  14. Kinky Bondage Review commented on Jun 17

    Kinky Bondage Review

    […]although internet sites we backlink to below are considerably not connected to ours, we feel they’re essentially worth a go by, so possess a look[…]

  15. Anal Plug commented on Jun 18

    Anal Plug

    […]just beneath, are quite a few entirely not related web-sites to ours, on the other hand, they may be surely worth going over[…]