“modest encroachments on privacy”

“In the abstract you can complain about Big Brother and how this is a potential program run amok, but when you actually look at the details, I think we’ve struck the right balance…You can’t have 100 percent security and also then have 100 percent privacy and zero inconvenience. We’re going to have to make some choices as a society…There are trade-offs involved.”

– President Obama this weekend.

How big is this NSA / PRISM scandal? Put it this way, for the first time in the last ten years, the two political parties have absolutely no idea how to react to it. On every other issue they’ve got a kneejerk response up and ready to go without even considering the facts.

But this time, it’s impossible.

Normally, liberals would be howling at the idea of spying and infringement on privacy – but it’s their guy in the White House approving this stuff.

Normally, the Right would be staunch defenders of this kind thing in the name of national security, especially given the private contractors involved – except this would align them with Obama! And that, above all, is not permissible on any subject, under any circumstances.

And so the Democrats are keeping mostly quiet as the President works up a defense of this activity.

A handful of Republicans shout for the extradition of the whistleblower but their hearts don’t really seem to be in it. There’s a lot of money funneled to their party from Booz Allen and the rest of the “Beltway Bandit” firms, they ain’t gonna get too loud.

The libertarians are probably the only ones with a strong, fully-formulated opinion on this kind of government overreach.

But the donkey and the elephant are walking into walls right now. When was the last time we saw this lull in the permanent, prefabricated war between them? When, in recent memory, have we seen them so speechless?

That’s how big this scandal is.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. sex commented on Sep 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/06/09/modest-encroachments-on-privacy/ […]

  2. w88 commented on Sep 20

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/06/09/modest-encroachments-on-privacy/ […]

  3. immediate edge reviews commented on Oct 01

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 21488 more Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/06/09/modest-encroachments-on-privacy/ […]

  4. immediate edge commented on Oct 03

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/06/09/modest-encroachments-on-privacy/ […]

  5. older dating commented on Oct 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/06/09/modest-encroachments-on-privacy/ […]

  6. cc shop legit commented on Nov 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/06/09/modest-encroachments-on-privacy/ […]

  7. Online reputation management agency commented on Nov 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/06/09/modest-encroachments-on-privacy/ […]

  8. Functional testing services commented on Nov 27

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/06/09/modest-encroachments-on-privacy/ […]

  9. Harold Jahn commented on Nov 27

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2013/06/09/modest-encroachments-on-privacy/ […]