Joe Nocera on the Nat Gas Act

The NYT’s Joe Nocera feels the same way about the Nat Gas Act as I do.  We both acknowledge the fact that it will be very beneficial to its champion, T. Boone Pickens…and we both say “so what?”

Can’t something be good for the country and good for the man behind an $80 million lobbying effort at the same time?

Here’s Joe on why the Nat Gas Act is obviously good policy:

The Pickens bill creates tax incentives — $1 billion a year for five years — to encourage manufacturers to begin building heavy-duty trucks that will be powered by natural gas instead of diesel. It also gives some tax incentives to truck-stop owners who install natural gas filling stations to help create the infrastructure.

On the face of it, this seems like a pretty small goal for a guy who’s got such big ideas about energy independence. Partly, Boone is being realistic. It would be politically impossible to convert cars to natural gas or to ask for gigantic tax breaks in this time of austerity.

Even so, this one small step could make a big difference. Of the 20 million barrels of oil we use each day, 70 percent goes for transportation fuel. The 8 million heavy-duty trucks on the road today account for 23 percent of that fuel. Although the tax incentives in the Pickens bill would be enough to cover only about 140,000 new trucks, he hopes that it will catapult the industry toward natural gas even without the subsidies. Just moving the country’s big trucks to natural gas, he says, could cut our OPEC imports in half.

More voices of reason in support of nat gas-powered vehicles.  Good.  Read the rest of Nocera’s column below.

Source:

Pass The Boone Pickens Bill (NYT)

Read Also:

My Natural Gas Trucking Archives (TRB)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. click here commented on Sep 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/04/20/joe-nocera-on-the-nat-gas-act/ […]

  2. pinewswire commented on Sep 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/04/20/joe-nocera-on-the-nat-gas-act/ […]

  3. rainbow cheats commented on Nov 12

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/04/20/joe-nocera-on-the-nat-gas-act/ […]

  4. Intelligent automation experts commented on Nov 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 17821 additional Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/04/20/joe-nocera-on-the-nat-gas-act/ […]

  5. Harold Jahn Edmonton commented on Nov 27

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 59577 more Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/04/20/joe-nocera-on-the-nat-gas-act/ […]

  6. 안전공원 commented on Dec 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 7423 additional Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/04/20/joe-nocera-on-the-nat-gas-act/ […]

  7. 안전공원 commented on Dec 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/04/20/joe-nocera-on-the-nat-gas-act/ […]

  8. replica rolex commented on Dec 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 48332 additional Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/04/20/joe-nocera-on-the-nat-gas-act/ […]

  9. Bimbim commented on Dec 31

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/04/20/joe-nocera-on-the-nat-gas-act/ […]

  10. omega replica watches commented on Jan 07

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/04/20/joe-nocera-on-the-nat-gas-act/ […]