Short-Sellers vs the Chinese Reverse Merger Scam

“The whole thing has no place to go but to blow up,” [John] Bird says. “That’s a rational position for an investor to start with — that every one of these Chinese reverse mergers is a fraud.” Executives of the companies in China, he says, are “thumbing their noses” at investors in the U.S.

I’m sure the guys running Roth Capital are just lovely and that there are tons of legitimate Chinese companies accessing US investment markets for the right reasons.

But I’m also sure that this onslaught of Chinese reverse merger companies represents the single biggest white collar crime wave in existence right now.

370 or so of these back door Chinese IPOs have raised a combined $20 billion from US investors since 2004.  Due diligence has been done at a bare minimum and the financial conditions of these businesses are routinely exaggerated.  The game plan is a reverse merger into a penny stock on the OTC bulletin board, followed by a jump to the American Stock Exchange (whatever the hell that is) followed by a Nasdaq listing – then comes the secondary offering.

In the meantime, gangsters mingle with grifters and persons who’ve been kicked out of the brokerage industry.  Legal and accounting work is done with the intention to obscure while language barriers and geographic realities serve as tools of the fixers, expediters and bankers who are cobbling these things together.

But a rag-tag band of short-selling crusaders is emerging and taking these reverse merger China stocks to task.  They are digging up credit records from foreign agencies, reconciling accounting records, suing auditing firms and even hiring private detectives to scout out purported facilities and places of business in an attempt to bolster their short theses.  And they are finally breaking through as regulators are paying attention and the internet is proving to be a valuable weapon in the fight against fudging.

Your weekend reading, a magnificent article by Dune Lawrence at Bloomberg, is below.

Source:

Texas Short Seller Fights China Fraud in $20 Billion U.S. Shares (Bloomberg)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Top Agency Hong Kong commented on Oct 10

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/01/22/short-sellers-vs-the-chinese-reverse-merger-scam/ […]

  2. 메이저놀이터 commented on Oct 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/01/22/short-sellers-vs-the-chinese-reverse-merger-scam/ […]

  3. jdrywall.com commented on Oct 19

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/01/22/short-sellers-vs-the-chinese-reverse-merger-scam/ […]

  4. online banking bmo commented on Nov 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/01/22/short-sellers-vs-the-chinese-reverse-merger-scam/ […]

  5. tangerine login commented on Nov 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 15289 more Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/01/22/short-sellers-vs-the-chinese-reverse-merger-scam/ […]

  6. Call Now commented on Dec 11

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/01/22/short-sellers-vs-the-chinese-reverse-merger-scam/ […]

  7. Vickyhunt commented on Jan 06

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/01/22/short-sellers-vs-the-chinese-reverse-merger-scam/ […]

  8. bnc bank commented on Jan 08

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/01/22/short-sellers-vs-the-chinese-reverse-merger-scam/ […]

  9. Software Regression testing commented on Jan 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/01/22/short-sellers-vs-the-chinese-reverse-merger-scam/ […]