Finally, Some Pragmatism from Obama

Taxation and tax cuts aren’t my issue.  I don’t claim to have done the research on their impact or lack thereof, I’ve seen all the same conflicting and contradictory studies you probably have.

That said, I know in my gut that the dumbest thing President Obama could possibly attempt to do at this juncture would be to screw with the middle class.  Thankfully, his latest statement on making the Bush tax cuts permanent for people earning under $250,000 was a pragmatic one – a sign that he gets it.

From the Huffington Post:

His position, he said, is to work first on an extension of the tax cuts for those making less than $250,000 a year. After that, Obama added, Republicans and Democrats can debate or vote on whether to continue extending the tax cuts for the wealthy.

A very smart way for him to frame the debate, not all tax cuts are bad and middle class earners spend the money, unlike the über-wealthy who are more likely to just let it pile up with little benefit to the economy at large.  Some more:

“My position is, lets get done what we all agree on,” said the president. “What they’ve said is, ‘We all agree that the middle-class tax cuts should be made permanent. Let’s work on that, let’s do it.’ We can have a further conversation about how they want to spend an additional $700 billion dollars to give an average of $100,000 to millionaires.

The permanent tax cuts for Million Dollar Babies is a separate issue and Obama is correct for drawing a distinction between the two.  If he can get across to the American people that he favors lower taxes for the middle class and can show a willingness to ease the taxes on small businesses, then the “redistribution of wealth” attacks he faces will be greatly mitigated going into his party’s trial by fire this November.

Source:

Obama Hints At Procedural Compromise On Bush Tax Cuts, Says GOP’s Holding ‘Middle Class Hostage’  (Huffington Post)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. sex commented on Sep 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/09/11/finally-some-pragmatism-from-obama/ […]

  2. pinewswire commented on Sep 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/09/11/finally-some-pragmatism-from-obama/ […]

  3. how does bitcoin evolution work commented on Sep 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/09/11/finally-some-pragmatism-from-obama/ […]

  4. Steroids online UK commented on Nov 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/09/11/finally-some-pragmatism-from-obama/ […]

  5. cbd oil reddit commented on Nov 27

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/09/11/finally-some-pragmatism-from-obama/ […]

  6. how to do automated regression testing commented on Dec 02

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 79790 more Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/09/11/finally-some-pragmatism-from-obama/ […]

  7. 17.digital marketing agency in Canada commented on Dec 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/09/11/finally-some-pragmatism-from-obama/ […]