Deal Volume as Contrary Indicator

The conventional wisdom is that as deal volume picks up, a bull market should continue.  Buyouts always engender bullishness and frequently show up in checklists of things to feel good about.

James Stewart turns this Myth of M&A on its head in Smart Money and posits a theory that deal volume is actually more indicative of market tops than bottoms…

A look at the numbers suggest that deal volume is, if anything, a reverse indicator of market direction. Consider that the all-time record for merger deals in a single year – $4.3 trillion, according to data-tracking firm Dealogic — came in 2007. That’s the same year the Dow Jones Industrial Average hit its all-time high. The feverish pace continued in 2008, until deal volume fell off a cliff after the collapse of Lehman Brothers and stock prices plunged. November 2008 marked the lowest level of M&A activity since 1995, when Dealogic started tracking deal volume.

Stocks bottomed in March 2009. So what happened to M&A activity in 2009, when stocks were undeniably cheap? Deals were few and far between, reaching a total for the year of only $1.3 trillion. The pace of deal making actually increased as stocks got more expensive.

Similarly, in 2000, when the Nasdaq hit its all-time high, global M&A volume reached $3.1 trillion, just behind the then-record of $3.13 trillion set the year before. In 2002, when stocks hit a post-bubble low, deal volume was only $1.27 trillion. (All M&A data are from Dealogic.)

Why are deals done after assets have gotten expensive in the public markets as opposed to when they’re cheap?  Stewart speaks with several M&A pros to find out why, click on over…

Source:

The Myth of M&A (Smart Money)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Immediate Edge Review commented on Sep 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/08/24/deal-volume-as-contrary-indicator/ […]

  2. Dumps Shop 2020 commented on Sep 27

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/08/24/deal-volume-as-contrary-indicator/ […]

  3. 메이저놀이터 commented on Oct 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/08/24/deal-volume-as-contrary-indicator/ […]

  4. track1,2 + pin commented on Nov 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/08/24/deal-volume-as-contrary-indicator/ […]

  5. tangerine login website commented on Nov 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/08/24/deal-volume-as-contrary-indicator/ […]

  6. togel online commented on Dec 01

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/08/24/deal-volume-as-contrary-indicator/ […]

  7. ruger in stock commented on Dec 01

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/08/24/deal-volume-as-contrary-indicator/ […]

  8. 바셀티비 commented on Dec 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/08/24/deal-volume-as-contrary-indicator/ […]

  9. discount wigs commented on Dec 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/08/24/deal-volume-as-contrary-indicator/ […]

  10. jasmine sex doll commented on Dec 31

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/08/24/deal-volume-as-contrary-indicator/ […]

  11. Study in Uganda commented on Jan 06

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 38820 more Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/08/24/deal-volume-as-contrary-indicator/ […]

  12. Digital Transformation Company commented on Feb 05

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/08/24/deal-volume-as-contrary-indicator/ […]