Who Else Got Pushed Around by Hank Paulson?

A Young Hank Paulson

A Young Hank Paulson

I just sat down and digested the B of A/Merrill Lynch Merger Investigation letter and I felt like I was reading excerpts from a Godfather IV script treatment.

Ken Lewis is no innocent, but Hank Paulson comes off like a f@ckin’ psycho in Andrew Cuomo‘s letter to the SEC and TARP oversight committee.  Cuomo basically gets Lewis to admit that he was taking one for the team (America) at the expense of his own shareholders, but Lewis would only admit that the negative impact of buying loss-laden Merrill would affect shareholders with a short-term time horizon.

That’s like a deli owner knowingly poisoning customers with day-old egg salad only between noon and two pm, followed by a fresh batch being put out for the dinner rush.

There are also several insinuations uncovered by Cuomo’s investigation that Paulson threatened the board of Bank of America with losing their jobs if they publicly discussed Merrill’s imploding financial condition or sought to terminate the merger agreement.

Ben Bernanke‘s Fed looms largely in the background of some of these discussions as well, although it doesn’t seem that Lewis coughed up any direct quotes from the Bearded One.

This is probably the last straw for many B of A shareholders who were on the fence about Ken Lewis’ future.  I predict he gets shown the door come April 29th at the Annual Shareholder Jamboree or he resigns over this coming weekend to spare himself the humiliation.

Now that we’ve gotten some glimpses into how this sh#t was going down last fall in the heat of the crisis, we should ask ourselves the following questions…

“Who else was strong-armed into poor decisions by Hank the Tank under the guise of preventing systemic risk?”

“Was Bernanke using similar tactics in his dealings with corporate officials behind closed doors?”

“Given that Bernanke’s Fed is not actually a part of the US government, shouldn’t we be concerned about its ever expanding authority, which apparently now includes dictating the terms of corporate mergers?”

“Were there other government-coerced shotgun weddings or TARP recipient actions that need to be looked into so that we, as investors and citizens, can get a more clear picture about what the new rules of the game may be?

“Where did that Bond Villain-lookin’ Neel Kashkari sneak off to and was he shaking his fist while shouting about ‘being back’ or stroking a cat on his way out?”

OK, I got carried away with that last one, but certainly, these questions and others will linger for a long time to come…Especially if you were a shareholder of Wells Fargo during the Wachovia deal.

The letter from Cuomo to those charged with watching the TARP and it’s participants is everywhere, but here’s a link to it on FT Alphaville:

Cuomo on B of A

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. wigs for women commented on Jan 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/04/24/who-else-got-pushed-around-by-hank-paulson/ […]

  2. bandar77 commented on Jan 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/04/24/who-else-got-pushed-around-by-hank-paulson/ […]

  3. Login Area commented on Jan 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 27815 more Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/04/24/who-else-got-pushed-around-by-hank-paulson/ […]

  4. Regression Testing commented on Feb 07

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/04/24/who-else-got-pushed-around-by-hank-paulson/ […]